Towards Sustainable Circularity? Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Ion Batteries with Bio-Based Materials

This prospective cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment evaluates lithium-ion battery pouch cells utilising novel bio-silica electrolytes and bio-silicon anodes and aims to integrate environmental sustainability and circularity considerations early in process development. Although the bio-silica and bio-silicon are sourced from barley husk bio-waste with minimal upstream burden, current processing routes are energy- and chemically intensive and generate substantial acid waste. Reliance on high-temperature treatments makes renewable electricity essential. Climate-change impact of cells utilising the novel materials falls from 13,200 kg CO₂-eq/kWh at lab-scale to 62 kg CO₂-eq/kWh when certain key parameters were optimised in an industrial scenario. Key levers for impact reduction include increasing active-material capacity, applying pre-lithiation, and optimising anode processing. However, even the best-case manufacturing energy demand (207 kWh/kWh cell) is around double that of conventional giga-factory production, underscoring the need for process innovation. From a circularity perspective, low material yields and high chemical intensity limit net environmental benefits, demonstrating that circular feedstocks do not inherently deliver sustainable outcomes. For developers, the results highlight the importance of more resource-efficient, higher-yield, and less energy-intensive routes to bio-silica and bio-silicon production, including feedstocks with higher silica content. For LCA practitioners, they emphasise challenges of scaling lab data and the scarcity of industrial benchmarks. Overall, bio-waste represents a potentially valuable feedstock for circular battery materials, although realising sustainable circularity depends on advances in processing efficiency and system-level optimisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-026-00908-0
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Sustainable Circularity? Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Ion Batteries with Bio-Based Materials

Haiman Hu, Behnam Chameh, Anders Nordelöf, Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen et al.
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Towards Sustainable Circularity? Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-Ion Batteries with Bio-Based Materials

Haiman Hu, Behnam Chameh, Anders Nordelöf, Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen, Rebecca Jayne Thorne, Xiaoyan Ji, Samson Yuxiu Lai, Fadoua Laasri, Sanaz Safa, Vesa-Pekka Lehto
article en

Abstract

This prospective cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment evaluates lithium-ion battery pouch cells utilising novel bio-silica electrolytes and bio-silicon anodes and aims to integrate environmental sustainability and circularity considerations early in process development. Although the bio-silica and bio-silicon are sourced from barley husk bio-waste with minimal upstream burden, current processing routes are energy- and chemically intensive and generate substantial acid waste. Reliance on high-temperature treatments makes renewable electricity essential. Climate-change impact of cells utilising the novel materials falls from 13,200 kg CO₂-eq/kWh at lab-scale to 62 kg CO₂-eq/kWh when certain key parameters were optimised in an industrial scenario. Key levers for impact reduction include increasing active-material capacity, applying pre-lithiation, and optimising anode processing. However, even the best-case manufacturing energy demand (207 kWh/kWh cell) is around double that of conventional giga-factory production, underscoring the need for process innovation. From a circularity perspective, low material yields and high chemical intensity limit net environmental benefits, demonstrating that circular feedstocks do not inherently deliver sustainable outcomes. For developers, the results highlight the importance of more resource-efficient, higher-yield, and less energy-intensive routes to bio-silica and bio-silicon production, including feedstocks with higher silica content. For LCA practitioners, they emphasise challenges of scaling lab data and the scarcity of industrial benchmarks. Overall, bio-waste represents a potentially valuable feedstock for circular battery materials, although realising sustainable circularity depends on advances in processing efficiency and system-level optimisation.

Circular Economy and SustainabilityVol. 6(3)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), DNV (Norway) (NO), Cégep de Sherbrooke (CA), Luleå University of Technology (SE), Institute for Energy Technology (NO), Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (SE), Equinor (Norway) (NO), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
European Commission, Norges Forskningsråd
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.