Urban Green Spaces as Carbon Sinks: A Comparative Scientometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and China’s Role

This study presents a comparative scientometric analysis of 526 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database to decode the global research trajectory on urban green space (UGS) carbon sinks and to delineate China’s distinctive role. Analysis reveals a clear evolution in research focus and output. Early work (before 2011) established foundational concepts. The subsequent period (2011–2015) witnessed significant methodological diversification, driven by advances in remote sensing and quantitative carbon flux assessment. Following the Paris Agreement in 2015, research emphasis shifted markedly towards policy-integrated applications and the exploration of synergies between carbon sequestration and sustainable urban development. A key finding is the rapid ascendancy of Chinese research output post-2020, a surge that has established China as a leading contributor to the field and is closely aligned with the national “dual carbon” goals. The synthesis identifies a critical methodological shortcoming: an “ecological analogy trap,” in which an over-reliance on forest-derived biomass equations systematically overlooks urban-specific anthropogenic factors. The methodological frontier is increasingly defined by the integration of multi-source remote sensing (e.g., LiDAR-optical fusion) and machine learning to overcome urban heterogeneity, though challenges in model transferability persist. The study concludes that while international scholarship increasingly emphasizes the coupling of carbon sink analysis with socio-ecological equity, China’s policy-driven research has prioritized the optimization of technological pathways for carbon accounting. To advance the field, future research must develop urban-specific protocols, leverage advanced computational techniques, and foster interdisciplinary, multi-scale frameworks to provide robust decision-support for achieving urban carbon neutrality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-026-00261-8
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban Green Spaces as Carbon Sinks: A Comparative Scientometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and China’s Role

Renzhong Guo, Xiaoyu Wang
Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Urban Green Spaces as Carbon Sinks: A Comparative Scientometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and China’s Role

Renzhong Guo, Xiaoyu Wang
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative scientometric analysis of 526 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database to decode the global research trajectory on urban green space (UGS) carbon sinks and to delineate China’s distinctive role. Analysis reveals a clear evolution in research focus and output. Early work (before 2011) established foundational concepts. The subsequent period (2011–2015) witnessed significant methodological diversification, driven by advances in remote sensing and quantitative carbon flux assessment. Following the Paris Agreement in 2015, research emphasis shifted markedly towards policy-integrated applications and the exploration of synergies between carbon sequestration and sustainable urban development. A key finding is the rapid ascendancy of Chinese research output post-2020, a surge that has established China as a leading contributor to the field and is closely aligned with the national “dual carbon” goals. The synthesis identifies a critical methodological shortcoming: an “ecological analogy trap,” in which an over-reliance on forest-derived biomass equations systematically overlooks urban-specific anthropogenic factors. The methodological frontier is increasingly defined by the integration of multi-source remote sensing (e.g., LiDAR-optical fusion) and machine learning to overcome urban heterogeneity, though challenges in model transferability persist. The study concludes that while international scholarship increasingly emphasizes the coupling of carbon sink analysis with socio-ecological equity, China’s policy-driven research has prioritized the optimization of technological pathways for carbon accounting. To advance the field, future research must develop urban-specific protocols, leverage advanced computational techniques, and foster interdisciplinary, multi-scale frameworks to provide robust decision-support for achieving urban carbon neutrality.

Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial AnalysisVol. 10(1)
Shenzhen University (CN), Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.