Image Quality Assessment of the External Carotid Artery and Its Branches on Ultra-High-Resolution Head and Neck Computed Tomography Angiography Using a High-Resolution 0.25-mm Detector and Deep Learning Reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction can improve image quality of CTA, but its benefit for visualizing small-caliber external carotid artery branches on ultra-high-resolution CTA remains unclear. We evaluated the image quality of ultra-high-resolution CTA of the external carotid artery using filtered back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction, and assessed its added value for visualizing small-caliber external carotid artery branches and tumor-feeding vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed 24 patients who underwent ultra-high-resolution CTA for evaluation of head/neck tumors or an elongated styloid process. Axial images (0.25-mm slice thickness) were reconstructed with each method. The quantitative analyses included attenuation, image noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, edge rise distance, and edge rise slope for the external carotid artery trunk and 11 branches. Two radiologists (each with 8 years of experience) independently assessed overall image quality, peripheral vessel sharpness, artifact severity, and clarity of the tumor-margin and intratumoral vessels, using a four-point Likert scale. Objective and subjective metrics were compared using nonparametric repeated-measures tests. Interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratic-weighted κ-value. RESULTS: Deep learning reconstruction provided the lowest image noise, highest SNR, and highest contrast-to-noise ratio for the external carotid artery trunk (all P <.001). For the 11 branches, deep learning reconstruction demonstrated the shortest edge rise distance (0.795 [0.751-0.824] mm vs. 0.982 [0.942-1.017] for hybrid iterative reconstruction and 1.044 [1.002-1.157] for filtered back projection), the highest edge rise slope(613.4 [586.1-686.5] vs. 393.1 [366.7-442.6] and 477.4 [446.9-524.7]), and the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (40.6 [36.0-43.2] vs. 16.7 [14.9-20.2] and 9.8 [8.3-11.0]) (all P <.001). Subjective scores were highest for deep learning reconstruction across all categories (median overall image quality: 4 for deep learning reconstruction, 3 for hybrid iterative reconstruction, and 2 for filtered back projection). Deep learning reconstruction also provided significantly superior visualization of tumor-margin and intratumoral vessels (P <.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial for all qualitative metrics (κ = 0.67-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning reconstruction markedly improves the quality of ultra-high-resolution CTA images of the external carotid artery system by enhancing vessel sharpness, contrast resolution, and tumor-feeding vessel conspicuity, although further validation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9375
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image Quality Assessment of the External Carotid Artery and Its Branches on Ultra-High-Resolution Head and Neck Computed Tomography Angiography Using a High-Resolution 0.25-mm Detector and Deep Learning Reconstruction

Motoma Kanaya, Yukie Shimizu, Noriyuki Fujima, Akihiro Homma et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Image Quality Assessment of the External Carotid Artery and Its Branches on Ultra-High-Resolution Head and Neck Computed Tomography Angiography Using a High-Resolution 0.25-mm Detector and Deep Learning Reconstruction

Motoma Kanaya, Yukie Shimizu, Noriyuki Fujima, Akihiro Homma, Yohei Ikebe, Yuya Hirano, Yuki Takano, Taisuke Harada, Kohsuke Kudo, Aogu Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki Kameda, Koji Yamasaki, Satoshi Kano
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning reconstruction can improve image quality of CTA, but its benefit for visualizing small-caliber external carotid artery branches on ultra-high-resolution CTA remains unclear. We evaluated the image quality of ultra-high-resolution CTA of the external carotid artery using filtered back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction, and assessed its added value for visualizing small-caliber external carotid artery branches and tumor-feeding vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed 24 patients who underwent ultra-high-resolution CTA for evaluation of head/neck tumors or an elongated styloid process. Axial images (0.25-mm slice thickness) were reconstructed with each method. The quantitative analyses included attenuation, image noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio, edge rise distance, and edge rise slope for the external carotid artery trunk and 11 branches. Two radiologists (each with 8 years of experience) independently assessed overall image quality, peripheral vessel sharpness, artifact severity, and clarity of the tumor-margin and intratumoral vessels, using a four-point Likert scale. Objective and subjective metrics were compared using nonparametric repeated-measures tests. Interobserver agreement was assessed using quadratic-weighted κ-value. RESULTS: Deep learning reconstruction provided the lowest image noise, highest SNR, and highest contrast-to-noise ratio for the external carotid artery trunk (all P <.001). For the 11 branches, deep learning reconstruction demonstrated the shortest edge rise distance (0.795 [0.751-0.824] mm vs. 0.982 [0.942-1.017] for hybrid iterative reconstruction and 1.044 [1.002-1.157] for filtered back projection), the highest edge rise slope(613.4 [586.1-686.5] vs. 393.1 [366.7-442.6] and 477.4 [446.9-524.7]), and the highest contrast-to-noise ratio (40.6 [36.0-43.2] vs. 16.7 [14.9-20.2] and 9.8 [8.3-11.0]) (all P <.001). Subjective scores were highest for deep learning reconstruction across all categories (median overall image quality: 4 for deep learning reconstruction, 3 for hybrid iterative reconstruction, and 2 for filtered back projection). Deep learning reconstruction also provided significantly superior visualization of tumor-margin and intratumoral vessels (P <.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial for all qualitative metrics (κ = 0.67-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning reconstruction markedly improves the quality of ultra-high-resolution CTA images of the external carotid artery system by enhancing vessel sharpness, contrast resolution, and tumor-feeding vessel conspicuity, although further validation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm these findings.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
YKK (Japan) (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.