Compression Behavior of Strut‐Based IWP Lattice Structures

Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattice structures have attracted growing attention in diverse industries owing to their exceptional mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity. This study adopts an integrated analytical–numerical–experimental approach to systematically explore the mechanical performance, energy absorption behavior, and deformation characteristics of strut‐based I‐graph‐wrapped package (IWP, alternatively denoted as I‐WP) lattices under uniaxial quasistatic compression. The novelty of this work lies in establishing analytical correlations between key mechanical properties (initial stiffness, plastic collapse strength, and Poisson's ratio) and geometric as well as base material parameters. Multiscale analyses were conducted to clarify the influences of unit cell size and relative density on mechanical properties. Lattice samples with different relative densities and unit cell sizes were fabricated via selective laser melting (SLM) and subjected to quasistatic compression tests. Results indicate that relative density governs the macroscopic deformation mode and energy absorption capacity, with mechanical properties exhibiting an inverse proportionality to unit cell size and direct proportionality to relative density. Notably, the Timoshenko beam model enables accurate prediction of the lattice behavior, showing good consistency with experimental results. This study offers valuable guidelines for the design and optimization of strut‐based IWP lattice structures in advanced engineering scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Materials
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202502174
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compression Behavior of Strut‐Based IWP Lattice Structures

WEI-BING LI, X J Li, Yue Wang, Jun-Bao Li et al.
Advanced Engineering Materials
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Compression Behavior of Strut‐Based IWP Lattice Structures

WEI-BING LI, X J Li, Yue Wang, Jun-Bao Li, Xian‐xu Huo, Tao Wang, Xiang‐hao Bai, Wei‐xin Bi
article en

Abstract

Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) lattice structures have attracted growing attention in diverse industries owing to their exceptional mechanical properties and energy absorption capacity. This study adopts an integrated analytical–numerical–experimental approach to systematically explore the mechanical performance, energy absorption behavior, and deformation characteristics of strut‐based I‐graph‐wrapped package (IWP, alternatively denoted as I‐WP) lattices under uniaxial quasistatic compression. The novelty of this work lies in establishing analytical correlations between key mechanical properties (initial stiffness, plastic collapse strength, and Poisson's ratio) and geometric as well as base material parameters. Multiscale analyses were conducted to clarify the influences of unit cell size and relative density on mechanical properties. Lattice samples with different relative densities and unit cell sizes were fabricated via selective laser melting (SLM) and subjected to quasistatic compression tests. Results indicate that relative density governs the macroscopic deformation mode and energy absorption capacity, with mechanical properties exhibiting an inverse proportionality to unit cell size and direct proportionality to relative density. Notably, the Timoshenko beam model enables accurate prediction of the lattice behavior, showing good consistency with experimental results. This study offers valuable guidelines for the design and optimization of strut‐based IWP lattice structures in advanced engineering scenarios.

Advanced Engineering Materials
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.