Regulatory Agency Reputation Acquisition With Regulatees: A Q Methodology Analysis

ABSTRACT Empirical studies examining how independent regulatory agencies acquire their reputation with regulatees are scarce. This gap is notable given established links between regulator reputation and regulatee compliance. To address this, this paper presents results of an online, self‐administered Q methodology study with 286 regulatees of 10 Dutch independent regulatory agencies. This study finds respondents generally form impressions of regulators primarily based on direct interactions with agency staff. Second‐hand information, notably from mass and social media, is far less influential. Regulatees differ, however, on whether they form their impressions based on agency‐ versus inspector‐level performance, and based on evaluations of how well the agency serves citizens versus the regulated sector. This study provides theoretical insights into regulatees as a distinct stakeholder audience, and practical implications for regulatory agency reputation management targeting this group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70124
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Agency Reputation Acquisition With Regulatees: A Q Methodology Analysis

Lauren Fahy, Erik‐Hans Klijn
Public Administration Review
Corporate Identity and Reputation
article

Regulatory Agency Reputation Acquisition With Regulatees: A Q Methodology Analysis

Lauren Fahy, Erik‐Hans Klijn
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Empirical studies examining how independent regulatory agencies acquire their reputation with regulatees are scarce. This gap is notable given established links between regulator reputation and regulatee compliance. To address this, this paper presents results of an online, self‐administered Q methodology study with 286 regulatees of 10 Dutch independent regulatory agencies. This study finds respondents generally form impressions of regulators primarily based on direct interactions with agency staff. Second‐hand information, notably from mass and social media, is far less influential. Regulatees differ, however, on whether they form their impressions based on agency‐ versus inspector‐level performance, and based on evaluations of how well the agency serves citizens versus the regulated sector. This study provides theoretical insights into regulatees as a distinct stakeholder audience, and practical implications for regulatory agency reputation management targeting this group.

Public Administration Review
Utrecht University (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.