Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab and bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Malaysia

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in Malaysia, compared with the current standard treatments in the Malaysian Ministry of Health (MOH) to inform public healthcare decision‑making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the Consumer Price Index for Health. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of key parameter uncertainties on the results. RESULTS: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided the highest quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years compared to sorafenib and lenvatinib. Sorafenib was dominated by lenvatinib due to lower QALYs and higher costs and excluded from further analysis. Compared to lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab yielded 0.873 additional QALYs and RM 44,863 additional cost, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RM 51,399 per QALY gained (∼0.906 GDP/capita at Malaysia's 2024 GDP/capita RM 56,734). CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is cost-effective compared to lenvatinib and sorafenib across willingness-to-pay (WTP) values of one to three times Malaysia's GDP per capita. These findings provide evidence to inform public health policy that expanding funding and adoption of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is likely to improve health outcomes cost-effectively.