Numerical analysis of two-phase flow and separation efficiency in a dynamic pressure oil-air separator for aero-engines

The dynamic pressure oil-air separator plays a vital role in aero-engine lubrication systems, as its performance directly determines overall reliability and efficiency. To enhance lubrication performance, it is essential to understand the internal flow characteristics within the separator. In this study, a Mixture multiphase flow model was employed to numerically investigate the oil-air two-phase flow field inside the separator. The effects of inlet velocity and initial oil-air ratio on the distributions of air phase, tangential velocity, and axial velocity were systematically analyzed to elucidate the correlation between flow field structure and separation performance. Numerical results indicate that the tangential velocity distribution conforms to a Rankine vortex structure: a forced vortex exists in the central region, while a free vortex forms near the wall. Axial velocity is negative near the central axis, indicating air motion toward the outlet, and positive near the wall, representing oil motion toward the bottom. At an initial oil-air ratio of 7:3, increasing the inlet velocity from 3.5 to 4.5 m/s stabilizes the internal swirling flow and mitigates air accumulation at the bottom, raising separation efficiency from 90.7% to a maximum of 93.9%. Moreover, a higher initial oil-air ratio facilitates a stable, continuous oil film along the wall, suppressing turbulent interphase mixing. Consequently, at 4.0 m/s, increasing the ratio from 7:3 to 8:2 further enhances efficiency from 92.5% to 93.3%. Numerical predictions agree well with experimental data, with a maximum error of 6%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100261447551
Primary Topic
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical analysis of two-phase flow and separation efficiency in a dynamic pressure oil-air separator for aero-engines

Zhibing Zhu, Wang Fei, Meng He, Yi Liu
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
article

Numerical analysis of two-phase flow and separation efficiency in a dynamic pressure oil-air separator for aero-engines

Zhibing Zhu, Wang Fei, Meng He, Yi Liu
article en

Abstract

The dynamic pressure oil-air separator plays a vital role in aero-engine lubrication systems, as its performance directly determines overall reliability and efficiency. To enhance lubrication performance, it is essential to understand the internal flow characteristics within the separator. In this study, a Mixture multiphase flow model was employed to numerically investigate the oil-air two-phase flow field inside the separator. The effects of inlet velocity and initial oil-air ratio on the distributions of air phase, tangential velocity, and axial velocity were systematically analyzed to elucidate the correlation between flow field structure and separation performance. Numerical results indicate that the tangential velocity distribution conforms to a Rankine vortex structure: a forced vortex exists in the central region, while a free vortex forms near the wall. Axial velocity is negative near the central axis, indicating air motion toward the outlet, and positive near the wall, representing oil motion toward the bottom. At an initial oil-air ratio of 7:3, increasing the inlet velocity from 3.5 to 4.5 m/s stabilizes the internal swirling flow and mitigates air accumulation at the bottom, raising separation efficiency from 90.7% to a maximum of 93.9%. Moreover, a higher initial oil-air ratio facilitates a stable, continuous oil film along the wall, suppressing turbulent interphase mixing. Consequently, at 4.0 m/s, increasing the ratio from 7:3 to 8:2 further enhances efficiency from 92.5% to 93.3%. Numerical predictions agree well with experimental data, with a maximum error of 6%.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics (CN), Precision Research (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.