Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst for governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability in resource-dependent contexts

The governance of socio-ecological systems increasingly requires participatory approaches that integrate stakeholder interaction, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and sustainability outcomes. This study develops and validates a multidimensional framework to examine how stakeholder interaction influences governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability, with CSR as a mediating mechanism. Using survey data from mining-related stakeholders and institutions in Takab County, Iran, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to test structural relationships consistent with the proposed theoretical model. The model showed strong reliability and validity. Findings indicate that stakeholder interaction significantly improves governance (β = 0.380), CSR (β = 0.679), and sustainability (β = 0.371). CSR further enhances governance (β = 0.408) and sustainability outcomes (β = 0.475), partially mediating both relationships (VAF = 42.1%, 46.5%). IPMA analysis, grounded in Takab's socio-environmental context, identified key governance levers (e.g., job satisfaction, social welfare, participation, and environmental solidarity) as high-impact yet underperforming. The quadrant-based mapping revealed institutional strengths and gaps, enabling targeted interventions and offering an adaptable diagnostic framework with the potential for transferability to similar resource-dependent socio-ecological systems. This study contributes to global sustainability debates by integrating stakeholder interaction, CSR, and governance into a unified SEM framework. Its originality lies in operationalizing CSR as a catalytic (mediating) mechanism, providing evidence for its role as a key transmission pathway, rather than a mere correlate, linking stakeholder interaction to governance and sustainability outcomes. • CSR serves as a key mediator enhancing governance and sustainability in resource-dependent regions. • Stakeholder interaction significantly boosts CSR (β = 0.679), governance (β = 0.380), and sustainability (β = 0.371). • IPMA reveals critical governance gaps in high-importance but underperforming areas. • The proposed SEM framework offers a transferable model for diagnosing institutional asymmetries. • The study redefines CSR as a strategic governance tool fostering participatory resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Policy
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.105931
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst for governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability in resource-dependent contexts

Hossein Azadi, Masoud Bijani, Saba Goli, Iman Islami
Resources Policy
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst for governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability in resource-dependent contexts

Hossein Azadi, Masoud Bijani, Saba Goli, Iman Islami
article en

Abstract

The governance of socio-ecological systems increasingly requires participatory approaches that integrate stakeholder interaction, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and sustainability outcomes. This study develops and validates a multidimensional framework to examine how stakeholder interaction influences governance effectiveness and socio-environmental sustainability, with CSR as a mediating mechanism. Using survey data from mining-related stakeholders and institutions in Takab County, Iran, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to test structural relationships consistent with the proposed theoretical model. The model showed strong reliability and validity. Findings indicate that stakeholder interaction significantly improves governance (β = 0.380), CSR (β = 0.679), and sustainability (β = 0.371). CSR further enhances governance (β = 0.408) and sustainability outcomes (β = 0.475), partially mediating both relationships (VAF = 42.1%, 46.5%). IPMA analysis, grounded in Takab's socio-environmental context, identified key governance levers (e.g., job satisfaction, social welfare, participation, and environmental solidarity) as high-impact yet underperforming. The quadrant-based mapping revealed institutional strengths and gaps, enabling targeted interventions and offering an adaptable diagnostic framework with the potential for transferability to similar resource-dependent socio-ecological systems. This study contributes to global sustainability debates by integrating stakeholder interaction, CSR, and governance into a unified SEM framework. Its originality lies in operationalizing CSR as a catalytic (mediating) mechanism, providing evidence for its role as a key transmission pathway, rather than a mere correlate, linking stakeholder interaction to governance and sustainability outcomes. • CSR serves as a key mediator enhancing governance and sustainability in resource-dependent regions. • Stakeholder interaction significantly boosts CSR (β = 0.679), governance (β = 0.380), and sustainability (β = 0.371). • IPMA reveals critical governance gaps in high-importance but underperforming areas. • The proposed SEM framework offers a transferable model for diagnosing institutional asymmetries. • The study redefines CSR as a strategic governance tool fostering participatory resilience.

Resources PolicyVol. 117
Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Ghent University (BE), Institute of Ecology and Geography (MD), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.