Evaluation of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer in radiotherapy

Background and purpose: Automation of radiotherapy workflows enhances efficiency, consistency and would support adaptive online dosimetry on standard linacs. This study investigated the feasibility and quality of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer. Materials and methods: ). IOV‑derived asymmetric safety margins around PTVn autocontours were computed from Euclidean distances. Results: of 95.1 ± 5.4%, while no significant impact on OARs dose was observed (p > 0.4). Conclusions: The quasi‑automatic workflow generated clinically acceptable, often superior plans. IOV‑based CTVn margins enhanced robustness and may hasten clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100983
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer in radiotherapy

Marie‐Claude Biston, S. Racadot, C. Laude, David Sarrut et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Evaluation of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer in radiotherapy

Marie‐Claude Biston, S. Racadot, C. Laude, David Sarrut, Anne-Agathe Serre, Moritz Westermayer, Daniela Sandu
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: Automation of radiotherapy workflows enhances efficiency, consistency and would support adaptive online dosimetry on standard linacs. This study investigated the feasibility and quality of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer. Materials and methods: ). IOV‑derived asymmetric safety margins around PTVn autocontours were computed from Euclidean distances. Results: of 95.1 ± 5.4%, while no significant impact on OARs dose was observed (p > 0.4). Conclusions: The quasi‑automatic workflow generated clinically acceptable, often superior plans. IOV‑based CTVn margins enhanced robustness and may hasten clinical adoption.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyVol. 39
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences (CL), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Centre de Recherche en Acquisition et Traitement de l'Image pour la Santé (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut National Du Cancer, Direction Générale de l’offre de Soins, Université de Lyon, LabEx PRIMES
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of a quasi-automatic treatment planning workflow for head-and-neck cancer in radiotherapy — Marie‐Claude Biston, S. Racadot, et al. · Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS