Community readiness to address rural health equity: Progress and challenges across eleven Georgia communities

Rural communities face persistent health disparities as well as unique barriers to improving population health. The five-year Two Georgias Initiative sought to build local capacity to advance health equity in 11 rural communities from 2017 to 2022. This multi-method study used coalition member surveys to assess changes in community readiness to address health equity and qualitative interviews (n=121) with local coalition leaders, coordinators and evaluators to understand how coalitions conceptualized health equity in the rural context, and to identify challenges faced in discussing health equity and its structural drivers. Community readiness to address health equity increased modestly over time (.5 on a scale of 1-9), with all coalitions progressing to the preparation or initiation stage. The greatest change occurred within the resident knowledge of efforts dimension, with the least change in leaders taking action to address health equity. Conceptualizations of health equity varied within and across coalitions. An emphasis on fairness and equal access was most common, with others highlighting the need to address root causes, prioritize vulnerable populations, or improve health of the whole community. Common barriers to deeper engagement with health equity concepts included the sensitive, emotional and often politicized nature of the topic, compounded by rural dynamics such as lack of anonymity, strong local norms and prevailing mindsets. Results suggest that groundwork can be laid for improving rural health equity, but that longer-term, concerted efforts with a clear objective are needed to address structural drivers of inequity. • Conceptualizations of health equity varied, with fairness and equal access mentioned most often. • Community readiness to address health equity increased modestly over time, with all coalitions in the preparation or initiation stage by the end of the initiative. • The greatest changes in readiness occurred within the resident knowledge of efforts dimension, with the least change in leaders taking action to address health equity. • Barriers to engagement with the equity concept, included its sensitive, emotional and often politicized nature, as well as rural characteristics (i.e., lack of anonymity, prevailing mindsets).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100777
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community readiness to address rural health equity: Progress and challenges across eleven Georgia communities

April Hermstad, Regine Haardöerfer, Michelle C. Kegler, Lauren Bigger et al.
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Community Health and Development
article

Community readiness to address rural health equity: Progress and challenges across eleven Georgia communities

April Hermstad, Regine Haardöerfer, Michelle C. Kegler, Lauren Bigger, Shadé Owolabi, Tina Anderson Smith, Melissa G Line, Alexis J. Smith
article en

Abstract

Rural communities face persistent health disparities as well as unique barriers to improving population health. The five-year Two Georgias Initiative sought to build local capacity to advance health equity in 11 rural communities from 2017 to 2022. This multi-method study used coalition member surveys to assess changes in community readiness to address health equity and qualitative interviews (n=121) with local coalition leaders, coordinators and evaluators to understand how coalitions conceptualized health equity in the rural context, and to identify challenges faced in discussing health equity and its structural drivers. Community readiness to address health equity increased modestly over time (.5 on a scale of 1-9), with all coalitions progressing to the preparation or initiation stage. The greatest change occurred within the resident knowledge of efforts dimension, with the least change in leaders taking action to address health equity. Conceptualizations of health equity varied within and across coalitions. An emphasis on fairness and equal access was most common, with others highlighting the need to address root causes, prioritize vulnerable populations, or improve health of the whole community. Common barriers to deeper engagement with health equity concepts included the sensitive, emotional and often politicized nature of the topic, compounded by rural dynamics such as lack of anonymity, strong local norms and prevailing mindsets. Results suggest that groundwork can be laid for improving rural health equity, but that longer-term, concerted efforts with a clear objective are needed to address structural drivers of inequity. • Conceptualizations of health equity varied, with fairness and equal access mentioned most often. • Community readiness to address health equity increased modestly over time, with all coalitions in the preparation or initiation stage by the end of the initiative. • The greatest changes in readiness occurred within the resident knowledge of efforts dimension, with the least change in leaders taking action to address health equity. • Barriers to engagement with the equity concept, included its sensitive, emotional and often politicized nature, as well as rural characteristics (i.e., lack of anonymity, prevailing mindsets).

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 9
Emory University (US), ABS Consulting (United States) (US), University of North Georgia (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.