Predicting text recognition word error rate of image documents without ground truth transcripts

Abstract Unsupervised error estimation is examined under the framework of the statistical decision theory. The error probability of a classifier trained with a training set of a finite, fixed size is considered, along with an unsupervised naive estimate of this error. In general, the naive estimates tend to be significantly smaller than the empirical errors measured using ground truth class labels, but the estimated values can be easily calibrated with a function whose parameters can be trained using moderate amounts of class-labelled data. This way, true error rates can be accurately predicted for new unlabelled data. These ideas are applied to the essential classification problem which underlies the automatic transcription of text images. As a result, various methods are developed to predict the Word Error Rate (WER) of a text image recognizer, on unseen sets of images for which no ground truth transcripts are available. Experiments on three large handwritten text datasets show that the error rates predicted by some of these methods are sufficiently accurate for practical applications. More specifically, absolute deviations of the predicted word error percentages from the corresponding real WER are lower than 1.7% for the three datasets, and the relative values of these deviations with respect to the WER of each dataset, are 5.6%, 4.2% and 6.1%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-026-00578-6
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting text recognition word error rate of image documents without ground truth transcripts

Alejandro H. Toselli, Enrique Vidal
International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

Predicting text recognition word error rate of image documents without ground truth transcripts

Alejandro H. Toselli, Enrique Vidal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Unsupervised error estimation is examined under the framework of the statistical decision theory. The error probability of a classifier trained with a training set of a finite, fixed size is considered, along with an unsupervised naive estimate of this error. In general, the naive estimates tend to be significantly smaller than the empirical errors measured using ground truth class labels, but the estimated values can be easily calibrated with a function whose parameters can be trained using moderate amounts of class-labelled data. This way, true error rates can be accurately predicted for new unlabelled data. These ideas are applied to the essential classification problem which underlies the automatic transcription of text images. As a result, various methods are developed to predict the Word Error Rate (WER) of a text image recognizer, on unseen sets of images for which no ground truth transcripts are available. Experiments on three large handwritten text datasets show that the error rates predicted by some of these methods are sufficiently accurate for practical applications. More specifically, absolute deviations of the predicted word error percentages from the corresponding real WER are lower than 1.7% for the three datasets, and the relative values of these deviations with respect to the WER of each dataset, are 5.6%, 4.2% and 6.1%.

International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR)
Scriptorium (CZ), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Generalitat Valenciana, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.