A systematic review of hydrometallurgical processes for lithium extraction from hard rock minerals, with a focus on enhanced utilisation of Delithiated Residues

• A first review integrating lithium extraction routes with solid residue valorisation. • 10 to 15 tonnes of solid waste generated per tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Sulfate and amorphous phase content govern the pozzolanic reactivity of leach residue. • 10–30% residue in concrete improves durability and long-term strength. • Extraction routes determine residue safety; fluorine and sulfate need strict control. Due to surging global demand for batteries and renewable energy technologies, lithium extraction from hard-rock lithium deposits has become a critical challenge. Conventional extraction processing involves high-temperature roasting, which is energy-intensive and generates large volumes of solid residues and heavy metal mobilisation, indicating the need for alternative efficient techniques. This systematic review paper, using the PRISMA guidelines, covers recent advances in hydrometallurgical lithium extraction processing from common hard-rock lithium ores such as spodumene, lepidolite, petalite, amblygonite, and zinnwaldite. The study investigates a range of processes, including acid and alkaline roasting, sulfation, chlorination, carbonation, fluorination, and emerging solvent leaching techniques, highlighting optimal reaction conditions to achieve higher lithium extraction efficiency. In addition, this work addresses valorisation of valuable by-products as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete, geopolymers, zeolites, ceramics, and road construction. By linking optimised extraction routes with efficient waste utilisation, this comprehensive review addresses key knowledge gaps and offers a coherent perspective on integrating lithium extraction with circular economy practices. Characterisation of leaching residues is also investigated for a better understanding of viable process adjustments to minimise environmental impacts. This review paper sheds insight into future research directions and supports the development of more sustainable industrial lithium extraction processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals Engineering
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2026.110311
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of hydrometallurgical processes for lithium extraction from hard rock minerals, with a focus on enhanced utilisation of Delithiated Residues

Hui Tong Chua, Ali Karrech, Aleksandar N. Nikoloski, Maryam Fallahzadeh
Minerals Engineering
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

A systematic review of hydrometallurgical processes for lithium extraction from hard rock minerals, with a focus on enhanced utilisation of Delithiated Residues

Hui Tong Chua, Ali Karrech, Aleksandar N. Nikoloski, Maryam Fallahzadeh
article en

Abstract

• A first review integrating lithium extraction routes with solid residue valorisation. • 10 to 15 tonnes of solid waste generated per tonne of lithium carbonate produced. • Sulfate and amorphous phase content govern the pozzolanic reactivity of leach residue. • 10–30% residue in concrete improves durability and long-term strength. • Extraction routes determine residue safety; fluorine and sulfate need strict control. Due to surging global demand for batteries and renewable energy technologies, lithium extraction from hard-rock lithium deposits has become a critical challenge. Conventional extraction processing involves high-temperature roasting, which is energy-intensive and generates large volumes of solid residues and heavy metal mobilisation, indicating the need for alternative efficient techniques. This systematic review paper, using the PRISMA guidelines, covers recent advances in hydrometallurgical lithium extraction processing from common hard-rock lithium ores such as spodumene, lepidolite, petalite, amblygonite, and zinnwaldite. The study investigates a range of processes, including acid and alkaline roasting, sulfation, chlorination, carbonation, fluorination, and emerging solvent leaching techniques, highlighting optimal reaction conditions to achieve higher lithium extraction efficiency. In addition, this work addresses valorisation of valuable by-products as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete, geopolymers, zeolites, ceramics, and road construction. By linking optimised extraction routes with efficient waste utilisation, this comprehensive review addresses key knowledge gaps and offers a coherent perspective on integrating lithium extraction with circular economy practices. Characterisation of leaching residues is also investigated for a better understanding of viable process adjustments to minimise environmental impacts. This review paper sheds insight into future research directions and supports the development of more sustainable industrial lithium extraction processes.

Minerals EngineeringVol. 245
Murdoch University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.