Factors associated with screening positive for immediate or sustained distress from a longitudinal study of older victims of community crime
Abstract Background The psychological impact of community crime on older people was significant, but there is a dearth of data assessing victims’ risk of sustained distress to inform practice. Aim To determine factors associated with initial distress and sustained depressive and/or anxiety symptoms following a community crime in older victims. Method In 12 UK urban areas, police screened older crime victims for distress within two months of a reported crime using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-2 scales and then rescreened those initially distressed at three months. Logistic regression identified associated factors, and screening costs were estimated. Results Of the thirty one percent (2,915/9,391) of victims screened, 40% (1,171/2,915) were positive on at least one measure; 61% (717/1,171) were rescreened and 50.4% (361/717) remained significantly distressed at three months. Sustained symptoms were associated with being female (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI):0.40, 0.86. P = 0.007), having previous anxiety or depression (OR = 1.75, 95% CI:1.12, 2.57. P = 0.004), their daily lives been affected (OR = 3.99, 95% CI:2.60, 6.13. P < 0.001) and a change in sense of safety since crime (very much more unsafe OR = 15.39, 95% CI:4.16, 56.95. P < 0.001). Sustained distress was decreased with home ownership (owner/occupier OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.69; private rented OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.67 vs council rented. P = 0.004). Factors associated with initial distress were also identified. Conclusions Crime-related distress was common and linked to sociodemographic factors and prior mental health issues; structured face-to-face assessments offered a quick, low-cost way to identify those at risk.
Authors
- Gerard Leavey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-8919)
- Gloria Laycock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-6890)
- Jessica Satchell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-4217)
- Marc Serfaty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-0776)
- Victoria Vickerstaff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-670X)
- Marta Buszewicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-5857)
- Chris R. Brewin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-4460)
- Monica Panca (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-6478)
- Jonathan Cooke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-9048)
- Anthony Kessel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0278-8313)
- Teresa Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0917-860X)
- Vari M. Drennan
Institutions
- University of London (GB)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Kingston University London (GB)
- Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (GB)
- Centre for Mental Health (GB)
- Institute for Security Studies (KE)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Improvement Service (GB)
- Language Science (South Korea) (KR)
- The Priory Hospital (GB)
- The London College (GB)
- Kingston University (US)
- Local Government Improvement and Development (GB)
- Comprehensive Clinical Research (US)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Research Connections
- Published
- 2026-04-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rescon/vmag051
- Primary Topic
- Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00