Multiple Rod Construct for Occipito-Cervical Fusion: Overcoming Challenges With Enabling Technologies

Introduction Occipito-cervical fusion is a well-established procedure for numerous cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies. Owing to the complex biomechanics at play in this region, rigid internal fixation with pedicle screws and rods is needed to provide stability for fusion and good clinical outcomes. However, the rates of implant failure are still worrisome, especially in individuals with compromised anatomy and physiology. We describe a method for using multiple rod constructs for instrumentation across the CVJ, making the construct biomechanically stable, achieving high fusion rates, and preventing complications such as implant failure. Methodology This is a retrospective observational study with 10 patients who underwent occipito-cervical fusion with navigation-guided cervical pedicle screw fixation and multiple rod constructs, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Clinical parameters, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Nurick grade, and modified Japanese Orthopaedics Association (mJOA) score, were evaluated pre-operatively and at follow-up. Similarly, radiological parameters such as occiput to axis (O-C2) lordosis, subaxial cervical spine (C2-C7) lordosis, and clivus-canal angle (CCA) were evaluated. Assessment of fusion was done by CT scan at 12 months post-operatively. Results All patients improved in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes post-operatively. Early mobilization on post-op day 1 with a soft cervical collar was possible in all the patients. No evidence of implant failure was seen in any of the cases. On follow-up CT scans, bony trabeculae formation was seen in all the patients. Conclusion Multiple rod construct for stabilizing the CVJ for occipito-cervical fusion is associated with early mobilization and clinical as well as radiological improvement due to the biomechanically stable construct provided by multiple anchorage in the cervical spine and occiput. This leads to high fusion rates, especially in patients with compromised anatomy and physiology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107690
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Rod Construct for Occipito-Cervical Fusion: Overcoming Challenges With Enabling Technologies

Mikeson Panthackel, Mukesh Patel, Yogenkumar Adodariya, Amritesh Singh et al.
Cureus
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Multiple Rod Construct for Occipito-Cervical Fusion: Overcoming Challenges With Enabling Technologies

Mikeson Panthackel, Mukesh Patel, Yogenkumar Adodariya, Amritesh Singh, Saurabh S Kulkarni, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Shivanand C Mayi, Bharat R Dave, Arjit Vashishtha, Ajay Krishnan, Mirant B Dave
article en

Abstract

Introduction Occipito-cervical fusion is a well-established procedure for numerous cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies. Owing to the complex biomechanics at play in this region, rigid internal fixation with pedicle screws and rods is needed to provide stability for fusion and good clinical outcomes. However, the rates of implant failure are still worrisome, especially in individuals with compromised anatomy and physiology. We describe a method for using multiple rod constructs for instrumentation across the CVJ, making the construct biomechanically stable, achieving high fusion rates, and preventing complications such as implant failure. Methodology This is a retrospective observational study with 10 patients who underwent occipito-cervical fusion with navigation-guided cervical pedicle screw fixation and multiple rod constructs, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Clinical parameters, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Nurick grade, and modified Japanese Orthopaedics Association (mJOA) score, were evaluated pre-operatively and at follow-up. Similarly, radiological parameters such as occiput to axis (O-C2) lordosis, subaxial cervical spine (C2-C7) lordosis, and clivus-canal angle (CCA) were evaluated. Assessment of fusion was done by CT scan at 12 months post-operatively. Results All patients improved in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes post-operatively. Early mobilization on post-op day 1 with a soft cervical collar was possible in all the patients. No evidence of implant failure was seen in any of the cases. On follow-up CT scans, bony trabeculae formation was seen in all the patients. Conclusion Multiple rod construct for stabilizing the CVJ for occipito-cervical fusion is associated with early mobilization and clinical as well as radiological improvement due to the biomechanically stable construct provided by multiple anchorage in the cervical spine and occiput. This leads to high fusion rates, especially in patients with compromised anatomy and physiology.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.