National Trends in Rectal Cancer Among Younger Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Introduction: In recent years, the incidence of new rectal cancer diagnoses among younger patients (< 50 years) has been increasing at alarming rates. Paradoxically, previous studies show that younger patients present with more advanced-stage disease; however, they have better survival rates than older individuals. In this study, we aim to examine the clinical and pathologic trends in younger patients with rectal cancer in a contemporary cohort. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was conducted to examine characteristics of invasive rectal cancer diagnoses between younger (< 50 years old) and older (≥ 50 years old) individuals in a dataset from 2004 to 2021. Joinpoint regression analysis (version 5.3.0.0, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to examine trends in rectal cancer over time. Chi-square analyses were utilized to determine differences in proportions of patients with earlier (Stage I/II) and later (Stage III/IV) clinical stage or grade disease between patients in the two age groups. Overall survival (all-cause mortality) was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 171,543 rectal adenocarcinoma patients from NCDB were analyzed. Joinpoint analysis revealed a rise in rectal cancer rates for both older (annual percent change (APC) 4.2% from 2011 to 2021) and younger groups (5.4% from 2004 to 2021), with a more rapid increase in the younger group. Younger patients were more likely to present with advanced stage (III and IV) disease (p < 0.001) and higher-grade tumors (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed worse median survival for younger patients at advanced (III and IV) stages of disease (-0.129 years, p = 0.016); however, there was no difference at earlier stages (p = 0.900). When stratified by tumor grade, those with higher-grade (Grade 3/4) tumors had significantly better survival than those with lower-grade (Grade 1/2) tumors (median difference: -1.071 years, p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is a rising incidence of rectal cancer in young patients, who often present with advanced disease and demonstrate worse outcomes than older patients when advanced, likely due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The high prevalence of late-stage diagnoses underscores the need for improved awareness and targeted screening strategies to promote earlier detection. Addressing these disparities is essential to optimizing screening, care, and outcomes for these patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107699
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Trends in Rectal Cancer Among Younger Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Ryan Bendl, James Clarke, Samantha Norden, Nolberto Jaramillo et al.
Cureus
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

National Trends in Rectal Cancer Among Younger Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Ryan Bendl, James Clarke, Samantha Norden, Nolberto Jaramillo, Adrianus Ekelmans, Madalyn G. Neuwirth, David J Samson, Mikaiel J Ebanks, Salma Khan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the incidence of new rectal cancer diagnoses among younger patients (< 50 years) has been increasing at alarming rates. Paradoxically, previous studies show that younger patients present with more advanced-stage disease; however, they have better survival rates than older individuals. In this study, we aim to examine the clinical and pathologic trends in younger patients with rectal cancer in a contemporary cohort. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was conducted to examine characteristics of invasive rectal cancer diagnoses between younger (< 50 years old) and older (≥ 50 years old) individuals in a dataset from 2004 to 2021. Joinpoint regression analysis (version 5.3.0.0, U.S. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to examine trends in rectal cancer over time. Chi-square analyses were utilized to determine differences in proportions of patients with earlier (Stage I/II) and later (Stage III/IV) clinical stage or grade disease between patients in the two age groups. Overall survival (all-cause mortality) was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 171,543 rectal adenocarcinoma patients from NCDB were analyzed. Joinpoint analysis revealed a rise in rectal cancer rates for both older (annual percent change (APC) 4.2% from 2011 to 2021) and younger groups (5.4% from 2004 to 2021), with a more rapid increase in the younger group. Younger patients were more likely to present with advanced stage (III and IV) disease (p < 0.001) and higher-grade tumors (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed worse median survival for younger patients at advanced (III and IV) stages of disease (-0.129 years, p = 0.016); however, there was no difference at earlier stages (p = 0.900). When stratified by tumor grade, those with higher-grade (Grade 3/4) tumors had significantly better survival than those with lower-grade (Grade 1/2) tumors (median difference: -1.071 years, p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is a rising incidence of rectal cancer in young patients, who often present with advanced disease and demonstrate worse outcomes than older patients when advanced, likely due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The high prevalence of late-stage diagnoses underscores the need for improved awareness and targeted screening strategies to promote earlier detection. Addressing these disparities is essential to optimizing screening, care, and outcomes for these patients.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.