Factors Associated With Unintended Dural Puncture and Failed Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetric Anesthesia

Objective: Unintended dural puncture (UDP) and failed neuraxial anesthesia increase risks for conversion to general anesthesia, procedural delays, and patient dissatisfaction. Additionally, UDP can result in a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with significant maternal morbidity. Factors such as clinician experience, multiple attempts, anatomical variation, and technical difficulty are modifiable areas for quality improvement. We aim to identify specific factors associated with UDP and failed regional at our institution. Methods: A one-year (July 2024-July 2025) retrospective electronic medical record-deidentified cohort study was conducted as a quality-improvement registered project. Controls (n = 126) were compared with UDP (n = 41) and failed neuraxial anesthesia (n = 38). Factors analyzed included demographic data (age, height, weight, BMI, gravidity, parity, and gestation) American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, trial of labor, anesthesia type (spinal, epidural, combined spinal-epidural (CSE), dural puncture epidural, and general), intrathecal catheter placement, conversion to general anesthesia, preeclampsia diagnosis, block attempts, provider status (resident, certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), and attending), failed regional anesthetic, and PDPH. Interval data were analyzed using the t-test; nominal data were analyzed using the chi-square test, including odds ratios. Assumption corrections included Mann-Whitney nonparametric testing, unequal variance corrections on t-tests, and Fisher’s exact tests, as needed. Alpha was set to 0.05. Results: Over this one-year period, 1,429 obstetrical cases were performed, with a UDP rate of 41 (2.9%) and a failed regional rate of 38 (2.7%). Factors significant for UDP included age, CSE anesthesia technique, provider status (more likely for a resident than a CRNA), more block attempts, intrathecal catheter placement, preeclampsia diagnosis, and PDPH. Factors significant for failed regional included older age, younger gestation, trial of labor, spinal anesthesia technique more likely than epidural, more block attempts, cesarean delivery, general anesthesia conversion, and preeclampsia diagnosis. Conclusion: Our analysis identifies older maternal age, preeclampsia, multiple block attempts, and provider experience as key risk factors for UDP and failed regional, highlighting modifiable residency training targets to improve obstetric anesthetic outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.107705
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated With Unintended Dural Puncture and Failed Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetric Anesthesia

Manuel C. Vallejo, James Cain, Kemal T Saracoglu, Kubra Cakar Yilmaz et al.
Cureus
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Factors Associated With Unintended Dural Puncture and Failed Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetric Anesthesia

Manuel C. Vallejo, James Cain, Kemal T Saracoglu, Kubra Cakar Yilmaz, Ayten Saracoglu, Christa L Lilly, Hiram Acevedo Bonilla, Mongan D Paul
article en

Abstract

Objective: Unintended dural puncture (UDP) and failed neuraxial anesthesia increase risks for conversion to general anesthesia, procedural delays, and patient dissatisfaction. Additionally, UDP can result in a postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with significant maternal morbidity. Factors such as clinician experience, multiple attempts, anatomical variation, and technical difficulty are modifiable areas for quality improvement. We aim to identify specific factors associated with UDP and failed regional at our institution. Methods: A one-year (July 2024-July 2025) retrospective electronic medical record-deidentified cohort study was conducted as a quality-improvement registered project. Controls (n = 126) were compared with UDP (n = 41) and failed neuraxial anesthesia (n = 38). Factors analyzed included demographic data (age, height, weight, BMI, gravidity, parity, and gestation) American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, trial of labor, anesthesia type (spinal, epidural, combined spinal-epidural (CSE), dural puncture epidural, and general), intrathecal catheter placement, conversion to general anesthesia, preeclampsia diagnosis, block attempts, provider status (resident, certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), and attending), failed regional anesthetic, and PDPH. Interval data were analyzed using the t-test; nominal data were analyzed using the chi-square test, including odds ratios. Assumption corrections included Mann-Whitney nonparametric testing, unequal variance corrections on t-tests, and Fisher’s exact tests, as needed. Alpha was set to 0.05. Results: Over this one-year period, 1,429 obstetrical cases were performed, with a UDP rate of 41 (2.9%) and a failed regional rate of 38 (2.7%). Factors significant for UDP included age, CSE anesthesia technique, provider status (more likely for a resident than a CRNA), more block attempts, intrathecal catheter placement, preeclampsia diagnosis, and PDPH. Factors significant for failed regional included older age, younger gestation, trial of labor, spinal anesthesia technique more likely than epidural, more block attempts, cesarean delivery, general anesthesia conversion, and preeclampsia diagnosis. Conclusion: Our analysis identifies older maternal age, preeclampsia, multiple block attempts, and provider experience as key risk factors for UDP and failed regional, highlighting modifiable residency training targets to improve obstetric anesthetic outcomes.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.