Defacing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Algorithms: A Review on Privacy and Data Integrity

Neuroimaging datasets are increasingly shared in open repositories for research purposes, raising concerns about participant re-identification through facial features visible in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MRI defacing algorithms address this risk by obscuring identifiable facial structures while preserving brain tissue for analysis. Algorithm performance varies substantially by context. For re-identification prevention, fsl_deface and mri_reface achieve the lowest recognition rates, while afni_refacer and pydeface demonstrate the highest processing success rates. However, all algorithms affect brain volumetric measurements to varying degrees, with some causing failures in automated segmentation pipelines. Performance is notably age-dependent, with specific algorithms underperforming in pediatric or elderly cohorts and in clinical populations with neurological disorders. Optimal algorithm selection depends on research priorities. For preserving brain measurements, mri_reface and SPM-based defacing are preferred; for pediatric studies, FreeSurfer better preserves brain voxels; for electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) co-registration, AnonyMI provides superior geometrical preservation. This review examines the major defacing algorithms and their validation across diverse datasets, evaluating effectiveness in preventing re-identification, preserving brain measurements, and maintaining compatibility across age groups. A comparative discussion highlights the trade-offs between privacy protection and data utility, emphasizing the need for a study-specific approach when selecting a defacing method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9373
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defacing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Algorithms: A Review on Privacy and Data Integrity

Licia Luna, Anjali Mehta, Umar Akram, Sana Rehman et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Defacing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Algorithms: A Review on Privacy and Data Integrity

Licia Luna, Anjali Mehta, Umar Akram, Sana Rehman, Vivek S. Yedavalli, Craig Jones, Arsalan Nadeem, Talha Iqbal, Janet Mei
article en

Abstract

Neuroimaging datasets are increasingly shared in open repositories for research purposes, raising concerns about participant re-identification through facial features visible in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MRI defacing algorithms address this risk by obscuring identifiable facial structures while preserving brain tissue for analysis. Algorithm performance varies substantially by context. For re-identification prevention, fsl_deface and mri_reface achieve the lowest recognition rates, while afni_refacer and pydeface demonstrate the highest processing success rates. However, all algorithms affect brain volumetric measurements to varying degrees, with some causing failures in automated segmentation pipelines. Performance is notably age-dependent, with specific algorithms underperforming in pediatric or elderly cohorts and in clinical populations with neurological disorders. Optimal algorithm selection depends on research priorities. For preserving brain measurements, mri_reface and SPM-based defacing are preferred; for pediatric studies, FreeSurfer better preserves brain voxels; for electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) co-registration, AnonyMI provides superior geometrical preservation. This review examines the major defacing algorithms and their validation across diverse datasets, evaluating effectiveness in preventing re-identification, preserving brain measurements, and maintaining compatibility across age groups. A comparative discussion highlights the trade-offs between privacy protection and data utility, emphasizing the need for a study-specific approach when selecting a defacing method.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.