The economic impact of clinical pharmacists in a tertiary care centre in Germany: pharmacoeconomic benefit calculation using cost-avoidance analysis

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) aims to assess the contribution of clinical pharmacists (CP) to optimize the medication process by interventions while simultaneously saving costs. The objective of this study was to provide a valuable contribution by calculating the pharmacoeconomic benefit per full-time equivalent (FTE) comparing costs of avoided adverse drug events (ADE) with CP wage costs in a German tertiary care centre. CPs recorded their interventions according to an internal documentation tool, and an expert panel evaluated the likelihood that these interventions would have averted an ADE. The internal cost-avoidance analysis involved determining the total amount of ADE excess costs that could potentially be avoided in 2021. This was achieved by multiplying the median probability of an ADE occurring, as evaluated by an expert panel, by the inflation-adjusted ADE excess costs. These factors, in combination with CP wage costs contributed to the calculation of the pharmacoeconomic benefit. FTEs were used to improve comparability. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted for relevant parameters. Some 221 out of 3,562 recorded active interventions were analysed. The major interventions made by CPs were medication stops or dosage changes, representing more than 50% of all CPS provided in 2021. To sum up, the findings demonstrated that interventions preventing ADEs are beneficial. A pharmacoeconomic benefit of €13,467 per FTE was calculated. The sensitivity analysis revealed further savings potential, as our model was based on rather conservative assumptions. This study has demonstrated pharmacoeconomic benefits of CP interventions. The necessity of integrating CPs into routine care to improve patient care quality while increasing economic efficiency has been proven. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects of these interventions and their implementation in other healthcare facilities to determine the full potential of CPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14527-w
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The economic impact of clinical pharmacists in a tertiary care centre in Germany: pharmacoeconomic benefit calculation using cost-avoidance analysis

Dominik Rottenkolber, Donald Ranft, Thilo Bertsche, Yvonne Remane et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

The economic impact of clinical pharmacists in a tertiary care centre in Germany: pharmacoeconomic benefit calculation using cost-avoidance analysis

Dominik Rottenkolber, Donald Ranft, Thilo Bertsche, Yvonne Remane, Nikolaus von Dercks, Julia Borella
article en

Abstract

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of clinical pharmacy services (CPS) aims to assess the contribution of clinical pharmacists (CP) to optimize the medication process by interventions while simultaneously saving costs. The objective of this study was to provide a valuable contribution by calculating the pharmacoeconomic benefit per full-time equivalent (FTE) comparing costs of avoided adverse drug events (ADE) with CP wage costs in a German tertiary care centre. CPs recorded their interventions according to an internal documentation tool, and an expert panel evaluated the likelihood that these interventions would have averted an ADE. The internal cost-avoidance analysis involved determining the total amount of ADE excess costs that could potentially be avoided in 2021. This was achieved by multiplying the median probability of an ADE occurring, as evaluated by an expert panel, by the inflation-adjusted ADE excess costs. These factors, in combination with CP wage costs contributed to the calculation of the pharmacoeconomic benefit. FTEs were used to improve comparability. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted for relevant parameters. Some 221 out of 3,562 recorded active interventions were analysed. The major interventions made by CPs were medication stops or dosage changes, representing more than 50% of all CPS provided in 2021. To sum up, the findings demonstrated that interventions preventing ADEs are beneficial. A pharmacoeconomic benefit of €13,467 per FTE was calculated. The sensitivity analysis revealed further savings potential, as our model was based on rather conservative assumptions. This study has demonstrated pharmacoeconomic benefits of CP interventions. The necessity of integrating CPs into routine care to improve patient care quality while increasing economic efficiency has been proven. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects of these interventions and their implementation in other healthcare facilities to determine the full potential of CPs.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), Alice-Salomon-Hochschule Berlin (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Universität Leipzig
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.