Pharmacodynamic interaction between trimethoprim and sulphonamides for <i>A. pleuropneumoniae</i> : synergistic ratios, optimal potentiation, and dynamic responses assessed via time-kill curves

AIMS: Trimethoprim (TMP) and sulphonamides are widely used in combination to treat many conditions, including porcine respiratory infections caused by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP), yet the pharmacodynamic basis of their synergy remains unclear. This study investigated the interactions between TMP and three sulphonamides (sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, and sulfadimethoxine) against APP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Interactions were evaluated against three APP strains using MIC determination, static time-kill assays of individual drugs across five TMP: sulphonamide ratios (1:4, 1:19, 1:99, 1:499, 1:999), and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling. Single-drug models showed greater TMP potency than sulphonamides (median EC50 0.018 µg mL-1 vs ∼3-10 µg mL-1). A General Pharmacodynamic Interaction model identified a unidirectional interaction in which TMP enhanced sulphonamide potency by reducing their EC50 at sub-MIC TMP concentrations (∼22-fold below the MIC), consistent with indirect antifolate action requiring folate depletion. Delayed sulphonamide effects and density-dependent growth limitation improved model performance. Maximal synergy, defined as the relative increase in bacterial killing rate, was 110-115% for all sulphonamides and occurred at a pharmacodynamic ratio of 1:250 (0.002 µg mL-1 TMP with 0.5 µg mL-1 sulphonamide). This represents a PD ratio and should not be confused with the classical 1:19 TMP: sulphonamide ratio reported for clinical effectiveness. Simulations using median porcine pharmacokinetics predicted rapid initial bacterial killing across intravenous and oral regimens despite pharmacokinetic ratio drift. However, sustained efficacy was regimen-dependent, with only the TMP-sulfadimethoxine combination achieving eradication, whereas others showed regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a mechanistic explanation of TMP-sulphonamide synergy against APP and highlight the value of semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling for optimising veterinary combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxag106
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacodynamic interaction between trimethoprim and sulphonamides for A. pleuropneumoniae : synergistic ratios, optimal potentiation, and dynamic responses assessed via time-kill curves

Ludovic Pelligand, Andrew Mead, Alexis Viel, Marine Boulanger et al.
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Pharmacodynamic interaction between trimethoprim and sulphonamides for A. pleuropneumoniae : synergistic ratios, optimal potentiation, and dynamic responses assessed via time-kill curves

Ludovic Pelligand, Andrew Mead, Alexis Viel, Marine Boulanger, Gudrun Overesch, Pierre-Louis Toutain, Aude Ferran
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Trimethoprim (TMP) and sulphonamides are widely used in combination to treat many conditions, including porcine respiratory infections caused by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP), yet the pharmacodynamic basis of their synergy remains unclear. This study investigated the interactions between TMP and three sulphonamides (sulfamethoxazole, sulfadiazine, and sulfadimethoxine) against APP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Interactions were evaluated against three APP strains using MIC determination, static time-kill assays of individual drugs across five TMP: sulphonamide ratios (1:4, 1:19, 1:99, 1:499, 1:999), and semi-mechanistic pharmacodynamic modelling. Single-drug models showed greater TMP potency than sulphonamides (median EC50 0.018 µg mL-1 vs ∼3-10 µg mL-1). A General Pharmacodynamic Interaction model identified a unidirectional interaction in which TMP enhanced sulphonamide potency by reducing their EC50 at sub-MIC TMP concentrations (∼22-fold below the MIC), consistent with indirect antifolate action requiring folate depletion. Delayed sulphonamide effects and density-dependent growth limitation improved model performance. Maximal synergy, defined as the relative increase in bacterial killing rate, was 110-115% for all sulphonamides and occurred at a pharmacodynamic ratio of 1:250 (0.002 µg mL-1 TMP with 0.5 µg mL-1 sulphonamide). This represents a PD ratio and should not be confused with the classical 1:19 TMP: sulphonamide ratio reported for clinical effectiveness. Simulations using median porcine pharmacokinetics predicted rapid initial bacterial killing across intravenous and oral regimens despite pharmacokinetic ratio drift. However, sustained efficacy was regimen-dependent, with only the TMP-sulfadimethoxine combination achieving eradication, whereas others showed regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a mechanistic explanation of TMP-sulphonamide synergy against APP and highlight the value of semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling for optimising veterinary combination therapy.

Journal of Applied MicrobiologyVol. 137(5)
University of Bern (CH), Royal Veterinary College (GB), École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Fougères (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.