Precision and age-related changes of 3D-DXA reconstructions and FEA of the proximal femur in comparison to DXA

The growing interest in 3D-DXA reconstructions for possible uses in fracture risk prediction or patient follow-up, e.g., in conjunction with finite element analyses, asks for precision data to increase the interpretability of results making use of the 3D-DXA technique. Using two datasets and a total of 2427 DXA scans of the proximal femur we evaluated the short- and long-term precision of standard DXA measurements. All the available scans were reconstructed using 3D-Shaper software and processed through a nonlinear finite element pipeline for femoral strength estimation. Short- and long-term precision were computed for thirty 3D-DXA-based parameters as well as femoral strength in fall and stance configurations. Precision errors were related to change rates of the respective parameters by calculating the trend assessment interval (TAI). Simultaneously, spatially resolved precision errors were computed for cortical parameters and error progression from DXA to 3D-DXA and FEA was considered. Precision errors were amplified through the different processing steps. Long-term precision errors were 1.6%, 2.0% and 7.5% for total hip aBMD, total hip integral vBMD and strength in fall, respectively. Errors between processing steps were only weakly correlated. Higher change rates for vBMD and strength compensated the larger precision errors, resulting in similar TAIs for total hip aBMD (5.5 years), total hip integral vBMD (4.6) and strength (5.8), respectively. Relative local precision errors of cortical parameters were largest in the superior and anterior neck region and above the lesser trochanter. 3D-DXA and thereon based FEA may offer interesting insights into the densitometric and mechanical quality of the proximal femur. The here reported results should offer a help for the interpretation of sequential measurements where these are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmr/zjag073
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision and age-related changes of 3D-DXA reconstructions and FEA of the proximal femur in comparison to DXA

Philippe K. Zysset, Yvan Gugler, S. Ferrari, Emmanuel Biver et al.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Precision and age-related changes of 3D-DXA reconstructions and FEA of the proximal femur in comparison to DXA

Philippe K. Zysset, Yvan Gugler, S. Ferrari, Emmanuel Biver, Kurt Lippuner, Daniela Angelika Frauchiger
article en

Abstract

The growing interest in 3D-DXA reconstructions for possible uses in fracture risk prediction or patient follow-up, e.g., in conjunction with finite element analyses, asks for precision data to increase the interpretability of results making use of the 3D-DXA technique. Using two datasets and a total of 2427 DXA scans of the proximal femur we evaluated the short- and long-term precision of standard DXA measurements. All the available scans were reconstructed using 3D-Shaper software and processed through a nonlinear finite element pipeline for femoral strength estimation. Short- and long-term precision were computed for thirty 3D-DXA-based parameters as well as femoral strength in fall and stance configurations. Precision errors were related to change rates of the respective parameters by calculating the trend assessment interval (TAI). Simultaneously, spatially resolved precision errors were computed for cortical parameters and error progression from DXA to 3D-DXA and FEA was considered. Precision errors were amplified through the different processing steps. Long-term precision errors were 1.6%, 2.0% and 7.5% for total hip aBMD, total hip integral vBMD and strength in fall, respectively. Errors between processing steps were only weakly correlated. Higher change rates for vBMD and strength compensated the larger precision errors, resulting in similar TAIs for total hip aBMD (5.5 years), total hip integral vBMD (4.6) and strength (5.8), respectively. Relative local precision errors of cortical parameters were largest in the superior and anterior neck region and above the lesser trochanter. 3D-DXA and thereon based FEA may offer interesting insights into the densitometric and mechanical quality of the proximal femur. The here reported results should offer a help for the interpretation of sequential measurements where these are required.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Geneva College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.