Variation in rates of post-operative oncological treatment for patients with glioblastoma in England: a comprehensive multi-year National cohort study from the GlioCova project

Although there are consistent guidelines of standardised glioblastoma patient care, there may be variation in treatments delivered due to differences in patient characteristics or adherence to guidelines across centres. This study explores the variation in treatments for glioblastoma patients across centres in a comprehensive multi-year brain tumour patient cohort in England. We analysed data from the Gliocova project that contains over 50,000 adult brain tumour patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 in England. We selected a glioblastoma patient cohort and explored treatment rates, systemic predictors of treatment, variation in treatment across surgical centres and survival rates for different treatment groups. We analysed data from 11 359 patients with a histological diagnosis of GBM. Almost 80% of glioblastoma patients received at least some treatment after brain surgery, with 40% receiving the guideline recommended aggressive treatment (47% in the under-70s cohort). Age, sex, deprivation status, comorbidities, surgery type (resection versus biopsy) and ethnicity were identified as systemic predictors of receipt of post-operative treatment. There was also variation in receipt of post-operative treatment (64%-86%) and receipt of aggressive treatment (16%-65%) across centres. Patients receiving aggressive treatment had highest survival (15.6 months); in patients receiving any post operative treatment survival was 12.5 months and in patients receiving surgery only survival was 2.5 months. 22% of glioblastoma patients undergoing surgery receive no further treatment and there is variation in post-surgical treatment both at centre and individual patient level. We suggest that centres should measure and report rates of no further treatment as part of standard clinical governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05440-7
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in rates of post-operative oncological treatment for patients with glioblastoma in England: a comprehensive multi-year National cohort study from the GlioCova project

Thomas C. Booth, Radvile Mauricaite, Sophie Camp, Kerlann Le Calvez et al.
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Variation in rates of post-operative oncological treatment for patients with glioblastoma in England: a comprehensive multi-year National cohort study from the GlioCova project

Thomas C. Booth, Radvile Mauricaite, Sophie Camp, Kerlann Le Calvez, Matt Williams, Stephen David Robinson, Andrew Brodbelt
article en

Abstract

Although there are consistent guidelines of standardised glioblastoma patient care, there may be variation in treatments delivered due to differences in patient characteristics or adherence to guidelines across centres. This study explores the variation in treatments for glioblastoma patients across centres in a comprehensive multi-year brain tumour patient cohort in England. We analysed data from the Gliocova project that contains over 50,000 adult brain tumour patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 in England. We selected a glioblastoma patient cohort and explored treatment rates, systemic predictors of treatment, variation in treatment across surgical centres and survival rates for different treatment groups. We analysed data from 11 359 patients with a histological diagnosis of GBM. Almost 80% of glioblastoma patients received at least some treatment after brain surgery, with 40% receiving the guideline recommended aggressive treatment (47% in the under-70s cohort). Age, sex, deprivation status, comorbidities, surgery type (resection versus biopsy) and ethnicity were identified as systemic predictors of receipt of post-operative treatment. There was also variation in receipt of post-operative treatment (64%-86%) and receipt of aggressive treatment (16%-65%) across centres. Patients receiving aggressive treatment had highest survival (15.6 months); in patients receiving any post operative treatment survival was 12.5 months and in patients receiving surgery only survival was 2.5 months. 22% of glioblastoma patients undergoing surgery receive no further treatment and there is variation in post-surgical treatment both at centre and individual patient level. We suggest that centres should measure and report rates of no further treatment as part of standard clinical governance.

Journal of Neuro-OncologyVol. 177(3)
University of Liverpool (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Sussex (GB), King's College London (GB), Charing Cross Hospital (GB), Walton Centre (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Imperial College London, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Brain Tumour Research, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.