External beam focal boost radiotherapy to intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: a scoping review

Background: Focal boost external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivers an escalated dose to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) in prostate cancer. It is an emerging field characterized by highly heterogeneous practices. Materials and methods: This scoping review was conducted with adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Eligible reports were reports detailing treatment methods and outcomes of focal boost EBRT in prostate cancer. Results: Forty-two studies were reviewed. Fractionation shifted over time from conventional to moderate and ultra hypofractionation. Patient populations were largely high-risk localized disease. Assuming α/β = 1.5, equivalent IPL boost dose in 2 Gy/fraction spanned 71.3-138 Gy in 32-45 fractions with conventional fractionation, 81.5-112.5 Gy in 15-25 fractions with moderate hypofractionation, and 96.4-196.4 Gy in 2-5 fractions with ultra hypofractionation. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used for IPL delineation in 39 studies, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in five studies. Five-year biochemical disease-free survival and overall survival were: conventional fractionation 92-98.2% & 100%, moderate 75.2-96.7% & not reported, and ultra hypofractionation 93.2-100% & 86-100%. Median ≥ Grade 2 genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicities were < 45% and ≥ Grade 3 < 10%. Conclusions: Focal boost EBRT appears feasible and may improve biochemical control without increasing toxicity, particularly in high-risk disease. However, optimal dose/fractionation, organ at risk constraints, and long-term survival benefits remain undefined. Large, preferably multicenter prospective studies involving several hundred patients, with standardized endpoints and comprehensive toxicity assessment are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100980
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External beam focal boost radiotherapy to intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: a scoping review

Mingwei Ma, Yun Bai, Ying L. Liu, Shangbin Qin et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

External beam focal boost radiotherapy to intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: a scoping review

Mingwei Ma, Yun Bai, Ying L. Liu, Shangbin Qin, Xueying Ren, Hongzhen Li, Xianshu Gao
article en

Abstract

Background: Focal boost external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivers an escalated dose to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) in prostate cancer. It is an emerging field characterized by highly heterogeneous practices. Materials and methods: This scoping review was conducted with adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Eligible reports were reports detailing treatment methods and outcomes of focal boost EBRT in prostate cancer. Results: Forty-two studies were reviewed. Fractionation shifted over time from conventional to moderate and ultra hypofractionation. Patient populations were largely high-risk localized disease. Assuming α/β = 1.5, equivalent IPL boost dose in 2 Gy/fraction spanned 71.3-138 Gy in 32-45 fractions with conventional fractionation, 81.5-112.5 Gy in 15-25 fractions with moderate hypofractionation, and 96.4-196.4 Gy in 2-5 fractions with ultra hypofractionation. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used for IPL delineation in 39 studies, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in five studies. Five-year biochemical disease-free survival and overall survival were: conventional fractionation 92-98.2% & 100%, moderate 75.2-96.7% & not reported, and ultra hypofractionation 93.2-100% & 86-100%. Median ≥ Grade 2 genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicities were < 45% and ≥ Grade 3 < 10%. Conclusions: Focal boost EBRT appears feasible and may improve biochemical control without increasing toxicity, particularly in high-risk disease. However, optimal dose/fractionation, organ at risk constraints, and long-term survival benefits remain undefined. Large, preferably multicenter prospective studies involving several hundred patients, with standardized endpoints and comprehensive toxicity assessment are warranted.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyVol. 39
Peking University (CN), Peking University People's Hospital (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, Beijing Municipal Health Commission, Peking University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.