What drives corporate greenwashing? A machine learning lens on pressure and opportunity in China’s A-share listed firms

Purpose This study aims to systematically identify the drivers of corporate greenwashing through the institution, market, organization and cognition (IMOC) framework. Grounded in institutional theory, resource-based view, agency theory and upper echelons theory, this research examines how factors across these four dimensions drive greenwashing through the dual mechanisms of institutional pressures and organizational opportunities, while establishing an effective prediction framework using machine learning techniques. Design/methodology/approach Employing a comparative ML approach, we comprehensively identify the factors affecting corporate greenwashing based on the pressure and opportunity dimensions and then explore how these factors influence corporate greenwashing by a sample of A-share listed firms in China from 2011 to 2022. The LightGBM, XGBoost and random forest algorithms are benchmarked against traditional logistic regression, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values used for feature interpretation. Findings The paper finds that (1) LightGBM outperforms other models in greenwashing prediction. (2) Institutional ownership concentration emerges as the strongest positive predictor, while moderate digital transformation and market competition exhibit inhibitory effects. (3) Digital economy development amplifies media monitoring efficacy and reduces principal-agent conflicts’ impact on greenwashing. Practical implications Regulators should prioritize institutional investors’ governance roles and establish digital transformation thresholds for environmental, social and governance (ESG) compliance. Investors can utilize our ML framework to assess greenwashing risks in portfolio companies. Originality/value This research pioneers the integration of institutional theory with explainable artificial intelligence in greenwashing detection, revealing the non-linear impacts of digital transformation. The proposed SHAP-empowered framework enables dynamic monitoring of emerging ESG risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Accounting and Finance Review
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-05-2025-0060
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives corporate greenwashing? A machine learning lens on pressure and opportunity in China’s A-share listed firms

Mingji Liu, Kaijie Jiang, Yao Xiao, Miao Yu
China Accounting and Finance Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

What drives corporate greenwashing? A machine learning lens on pressure and opportunity in China’s A-share listed firms

Mingji Liu, Kaijie Jiang, Yao Xiao, Miao Yu
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to systematically identify the drivers of corporate greenwashing through the institution, market, organization and cognition (IMOC) framework. Grounded in institutional theory, resource-based view, agency theory and upper echelons theory, this research examines how factors across these four dimensions drive greenwashing through the dual mechanisms of institutional pressures and organizational opportunities, while establishing an effective prediction framework using machine learning techniques. Design/methodology/approach Employing a comparative ML approach, we comprehensively identify the factors affecting corporate greenwashing based on the pressure and opportunity dimensions and then explore how these factors influence corporate greenwashing by a sample of A-share listed firms in China from 2011 to 2022. The LightGBM, XGBoost and random forest algorithms are benchmarked against traditional logistic regression, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values used for feature interpretation. Findings The paper finds that (1) LightGBM outperforms other models in greenwashing prediction. (2) Institutional ownership concentration emerges as the strongest positive predictor, while moderate digital transformation and market competition exhibit inhibitory effects. (3) Digital economy development amplifies media monitoring efficacy and reduces principal-agent conflicts’ impact on greenwashing. Practical implications Regulators should prioritize institutional investors’ governance roles and establish digital transformation thresholds for environmental, social and governance (ESG) compliance. Investors can utilize our ML framework to assess greenwashing risks in portfolio companies. Originality/value This research pioneers the integration of institutional theory with explainable artificial intelligence in greenwashing detection, revealing the non-linear impacts of digital transformation. The proposed SHAP-empowered framework enables dynamic monitoring of emerging ESG risks.

China Accounting and Finance Review
Beijing Foreign Studies University (CN), Dongbei University of Finance and Economics (CN), Department of Space (IN), Space Engineering University (CN), Beijing International Studies University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.