Educational films for improving perinatal outcomes associated with gestational diabetes in Uganda and India:a cluster randomised trial

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We evaluated whether a film-based educational intervention for pregnant women and health care providers to improve timely detection and management of GDM could reduce the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes.<br/><br/>Methods: Two parallel-group cluster randomised trials were conducted in Uganda and India. A package of 7 interconnected culturally-tailored educational films was developed following formative research. Thirty government-funded health facilities (clusters) in each country were randomised (1:1) to intervention or control arm. In intervention facilities (15 in each country), films were shared with pregnant women and health professionals; control facilities (15 in each country) received usual care. The outcome was an individual self-reported composite of unplanned caesarean section, stillbirth or neonatal death, or neonatal hospitalisation. Mixed effects models were used in an intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation by chained equations to address missing data. Analyses were performed separately for each country; random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence ratios. Data analysts were blinded to group allocation, but participants, facility, and trial staff were not.<br/><br/>Results: In Uganda, 5495 women were screened between May 2021 and April 2022, and 5102 (92.8%) participated in the trial. In India, 12,045 women were screened between July 2021 and January 2022, and 10899 (90.5%) participated. Loss to follow-up was 31.7% in Uganda and 12.1% in India. In Uganda, the prevalence of the composite adverse perinatal outcome was 19.7% in the control arm and 19.8% in the intervention arm (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14). For India, the prevalence was 29.5% and 30.6% respectively (PR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.11). The pooled PR across both countries was 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.10).<br/><br/>Conclusions: A film-based intervention did not reduce the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with GDM. Future evaluations should assess educational films delivered alongside more intensive intervention components.<br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-04-27
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational films for improving perinatal outcomes associated with gestational diabetes in Uganda and India:a cluster randomised trial

Lily Hopkins, Laura Oakley, Yamuna Ana, Eunice Lobo et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Educational films for improving perinatal outcomes associated with gestational diabetes in Uganda and India:a cluster randomised trial

Lily Hopkins, Laura Oakley, Yamuna Ana, Eunice Lobo, Helen Coombe, Arthur Namara, Debarati Mukherjee, Biswamitra Sahu, Judith Lieber, Maithili Karthik, J. S. Seeley, Moffat Nyirenda, Poppy Mallinson, Eugene Oteng-Ntim, Sanjay Kinra, Deepa Ravi, Nicolas Birk, Iliatha; id_orcid 0000-0002-2991-2578 Papachristou Nadal, Giridhara Rathnaiah Babu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a high risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We evaluated whether a film-based educational intervention for pregnant women and health care providers to improve timely detection and management of GDM could reduce the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes.<br/><br/>Methods: Two parallel-group cluster randomised trials were conducted in Uganda and India. A package of 7 interconnected culturally-tailored educational films was developed following formative research. Thirty government-funded health facilities (clusters) in each country were randomised (1:1) to intervention or control arm. In intervention facilities (15 in each country), films were shared with pregnant women and health professionals; control facilities (15 in each country) received usual care. The outcome was an individual self-reported composite of unplanned caesarean section, stillbirth or neonatal death, or neonatal hospitalisation. Mixed effects models were used in an intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation by chained equations to address missing data. Analyses were performed separately for each country; random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence ratios. Data analysts were blinded to group allocation, but participants, facility, and trial staff were not.<br/><br/>Results: In Uganda, 5495 women were screened between May 2021 and April 2022, and 5102 (92.8%) participated in the trial. In India, 12,045 women were screened between July 2021 and January 2022, and 10899 (90.5%) participated. Loss to follow-up was 31.7% in Uganda and 12.1% in India. In Uganda, the prevalence of the composite adverse perinatal outcome was 19.7% in the control arm and 19.8% in the intervention arm (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14). For India, the prevalence was 29.5% and 30.6% respectively (PR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.11). The pooled PR across both countries was 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.10).<br/><br/>Conclusions: A film-based intervention did not reduce the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with GDM. Future evaluations should assess educational films delivered alongside more intensive intervention components.<br/>

Research Portal (King's College London)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Harvard University Press (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Public Health Foundation of India (IN), Uganda Virus Research Institute (UG)
UK Research and Innovation, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.