Vibrotactile augmentation enhances late-phase control in sequential reaching without accuracy costs

Introduction: Sequential goal-directed movements require the integration of advance planning and online control processes. However, the extent to which augmented sensory feedback influences these processes across multiple movement segments remains unclear. Vibrotactile and auditory feedback may enhance motor control by providing additional sensory information during movement execution, particularly in complex sequential tasks. Methods: Twenty-four neurotypical adults (mean age 27.04 ± 5.31 years) performed one-target and four two-target reaching tasks involving single- and bimanual movements with extension and reversal components. Participants completed the tasks under three sensory conditions: no feedback, auditory feedback, and vibrotactile feedback delivered at first target contact. Reaction time, movement time, spatial accuracy, and kinematic measures including peak velocity and time after peak velocity were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results: Reaction time was significantly influenced by both sensory condition and target task complexity, with faster movement initiation observed in the no-feedback condition and during less complex movement sequences. Sensory condition did not significantly affect overall movement time or spatial accuracy. However, vibrotactile feedback significantly reduced time after peak velocity during the second movement segment, indicating enhanced late-phase control without compromising accuracy. Target task complexity also significantly modulated kinematic control, particularly during bimanual reversal movements. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that vibrotactile feedback selectively enhances deceleration-related control during sequential reaching movements, supporting its role as an effective sensory augmentation strategy for improving movement efficiency in complex motor tasks. Such low-cost sensory interventions may have practical implications for enhancing motor performance in populations experiencing age-related or neurological declines in sensorimotor function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1794200
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vibrotactile augmentation enhances late-phase control in sequential reaching without accuracy costs

Jonathan J. Marotta, Cheryl M. Glazebrook, Quinn Malone, Saba Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz et al.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Vibrotactile augmentation enhances late-phase control in sequential reaching without accuracy costs

Jonathan J. Marotta, Cheryl M. Glazebrook, Quinn Malone, Saba Mohammadalinezhad Kolahdouz, Steven R. Passmore
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sequential goal-directed movements require the integration of advance planning and online control processes. However, the extent to which augmented sensory feedback influences these processes across multiple movement segments remains unclear. Vibrotactile and auditory feedback may enhance motor control by providing additional sensory information during movement execution, particularly in complex sequential tasks. Methods: Twenty-four neurotypical adults (mean age 27.04 ± 5.31 years) performed one-target and four two-target reaching tasks involving single- and bimanual movements with extension and reversal components. Participants completed the tasks under three sensory conditions: no feedback, auditory feedback, and vibrotactile feedback delivered at first target contact. Reaction time, movement time, spatial accuracy, and kinematic measures including peak velocity and time after peak velocity were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. Results: Reaction time was significantly influenced by both sensory condition and target task complexity, with faster movement initiation observed in the no-feedback condition and during less complex movement sequences. Sensory condition did not significantly affect overall movement time or spatial accuracy. However, vibrotactile feedback significantly reduced time after peak velocity during the second movement segment, indicating enhanced late-phase control without compromising accuracy. Target task complexity also significantly modulated kinematic control, particularly during bimanual reversal movements. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that vibrotactile feedback selectively enhances deceleration-related control during sequential reaching movements, supporting its role as an effective sensory augmentation strategy for improving movement efficiency in complex motor tasks. Such low-cost sensory interventions may have practical implications for enhancing motor performance in populations experiencing age-related or neurological declines in sensorimotor function.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 20
Knowledge Integration (United Kingdom) (GB), Research for Action (US), GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) (US), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.