Reconstructing Hierarchy through Treaties and Regulations: Qing’s East Asian Diplomacy in the Late 19th Century

This study analyzes how the Qing Empire reconfigured diplomatic hierarchy in East Asia in the late nineteenth century through its treaty-making practices.Focusing on Qing-Japan and Qing-Chosn relations after the Sino-Japanese Treaty of Amity (1871) and the Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade Between Chinese and Corean (1882), it explores how the Qing court redefined its regional authority by employing the language and format of modern international treaties while maintaining the traditional logic of suzerainty.By analyzing memorials, diplomatic correspondence, and treaty texts in Chinese, Chosn (Korean), and Japanese, the article demonstrates a strategic transformation in Qing officials' approach to external relations and regional geopolitics in East Asia, within a new framework shaped by Western international law.The article argues that Qing diplomacy was structured around a deliberate strategy of institutional differentiation, in which modern diplomatic forms were selectively adopted to reinforce, rather than transform, existing hierarchical relations.While the Treaty of Amity with Japan nominally presupposed sovereign equality, its internal provisions -including asymmetrical official designations and non-transferable privileges -embedded Qing hierarchical assumptions within a formally modern framework.In contrast, the Trade Regulations with Chosn explicitly codified suzerainty, granting Qing commercial commissioners extensive judicial and administrative authority that far exceeded the reciprocal standards of Western treaty practice.Ultimately, this study suggests that late Qing treaty diplomacy was not merely a passive response to Western imperialism, but an active and strategic reconfiguration of regional hierarchy under modern institutional conditions.This study thus illuminates how non-Western polities navigated the tension between hierarchical authority and sovereign forms in the making of the modern international order.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Journal of International Studies
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2026.04.24.1.37
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing Hierarchy through Treaties and Regulations: Qing’s East Asian Diplomacy in the Late 19th Century

Bong-Jun Kim
1 citations
The Korean Journal of International Studies
Chinese history and philosophy
43.30
article

Reconstructing Hierarchy through Treaties and Regulations: Qing’s East Asian Diplomacy in the Late 19th Century

Bong-Jun Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes how the Qing Empire reconfigured diplomatic hierarchy in East Asia in the late nineteenth century through its treaty-making practices.Focusing on Qing-Japan and Qing-Chosn relations after the Sino-Japanese Treaty of Amity (1871) and the Regulations for Maritime and Overland Trade Between Chinese and Corean (1882), it explores how the Qing court redefined its regional authority by employing the language and format of modern international treaties while maintaining the traditional logic of suzerainty.By analyzing memorials, diplomatic correspondence, and treaty texts in Chinese, Chosn (Korean), and Japanese, the article demonstrates a strategic transformation in Qing officials' approach to external relations and regional geopolitics in East Asia, within a new framework shaped by Western international law.The article argues that Qing diplomacy was structured around a deliberate strategy of institutional differentiation, in which modern diplomatic forms were selectively adopted to reinforce, rather than transform, existing hierarchical relations.While the Treaty of Amity with Japan nominally presupposed sovereign equality, its internal provisions -including asymmetrical official designations and non-transferable privileges -embedded Qing hierarchical assumptions within a formally modern framework.In contrast, the Trade Regulations with Chosn explicitly codified suzerainty, granting Qing commercial commissioners extensive judicial and administrative authority that far exceeded the reciprocal standards of Western treaty practice.Ultimately, this study suggests that late Qing treaty diplomacy was not merely a passive response to Western imperialism, but an active and strategic reconfiguration of regional hierarchy under modern institutional conditions.This study thus illuminates how non-Western polities navigated the tension between hierarchical authority and sovereign forms in the making of the modern international order.

The Korean Journal of International StudiesVol. 24(1)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Chinese history and philosophy
43.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.