Imipramine

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Although combined plasma levels of imipramine and its metabolite desipramine are routinely assessed during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of imipramine treatment, individual plasma levels are often overlooked. Imipramine and desipramine differ in their pharmacokinetic properties. Previous research in patients with generalized anxiety disorder suggested that imipramine treatment efficacy might be negatively influenced by high desipramine levels. We thus explored the relationship between imipramine and desipramine levels and treatment response in depressed inpatients. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This exploratory retrospective study involved 70 inpatients with major depression disorder who had undergone 5-week imipramine treatment. Weekly combined levels were measured, and adjustments were made until adequate levels were reached. We assessed response rates on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS17) and used Mann-Whitney U tests to compare imipramine and desipramine plasma levels between responders and nonresponders. FINDINGS/RESULTS: After 5 weeks of treatment, nonresponders had significantly higher desipramine levels (P = 0.015) and combined plasma levels (P = 0.020) than responders. Imipramine levels did not differ significantly between groups. Plasma levels did not differ significantly between patients with and without concomitant CYP2D6- or CYP2C19-inhibiting medication. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: By showing that desipramine plasma levels were higher in nonresponders to imipramine treatment, our findings imply that desipramine negatively impacts imipramine's therapeutic effect. When performing TDM, it may be important to consider metabolite plasma levels as well as combined plasma levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0000000000002187
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imipramine

Birgit C. P. Koch, Astrid M. Kamperman, Tom K. Birkenhäger, Roan Y.N. Kasanmonadi
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
article

Imipramine

Birgit C. P. Koch, Astrid M. Kamperman, Tom K. Birkenhäger, Roan Y.N. Kasanmonadi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Although combined plasma levels of imipramine and its metabolite desipramine are routinely assessed during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of imipramine treatment, individual plasma levels are often overlooked. Imipramine and desipramine differ in their pharmacokinetic properties. Previous research in patients with generalized anxiety disorder suggested that imipramine treatment efficacy might be negatively influenced by high desipramine levels. We thus explored the relationship between imipramine and desipramine levels and treatment response in depressed inpatients. METHODS/PROCEDURES: This exploratory retrospective study involved 70 inpatients with major depression disorder who had undergone 5-week imipramine treatment. Weekly combined levels were measured, and adjustments were made until adequate levels were reached. We assessed response rates on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS17) and used Mann-Whitney U tests to compare imipramine and desipramine plasma levels between responders and nonresponders. FINDINGS/RESULTS: After 5 weeks of treatment, nonresponders had significantly higher desipramine levels (P = 0.015) and combined plasma levels (P = 0.020) than responders. Imipramine levels did not differ significantly between groups. Plasma levels did not differ significantly between patients with and without concomitant CYP2D6- or CYP2C19-inhibiting medication. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: By showing that desipramine plasma levels were higher in nonresponders to imipramine treatment, our findings imply that desipramine negatively impacts imipramine's therapeutic effect. When performing TDM, it may be important to consider metabolite plasma levels as well as combined plasma levels.

Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Erasmus MC (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.