Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review

Bioaerosol emissions from biological treatment processes like composting, livestock operations, and wastewater plants pose notable occupational and environmental health risks. Biofiltration is a common mitigation measure for gaseous pollutants, but its effectiveness in controlling bioaerosols is less studied. This review synthesizes current evidence on biofiltration for the removal of bioaerosols. Findings indicate that biofiltration can significantly reduce emissions from waste-related biological processes, although results vary widely and depend heavily on design and operational factors. In composting, agricultural, and wastewater treatment contexts, fungal bioaerosols are consistently removed with high efficiency, often over 90%. Conversely, bacterial removal shows greater variability, from negligible to above 90%, influenced primarily by airflow rate, bed depth, and media stability. Systems with residence times of tens of seconds and bed depths of at least 1 m tend to reliably reduce bacterial counts, whereas undersized, high-flow systems experience marked efficiency losses. The choice of packing material is also crucial; mature, stable media maintain performance, whereas nutrient-rich or unstable substrates can lead to fungal emissions, turning the biofilter into a secondary source. Data on endotoxin removal are limited and remain insufficient for firm design recommendations. Overall, biofiltration’s effectiveness depends on complex interactions among physical retention, biological stability, and design. These insights emphasize the need for future research to focus on standardized, performance-based design criteria supported by consistent reporting and full-scale validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14050963
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review

Andrés M. Vélez-Pereira, David J. O’Connor, Yiniva Camargo Caicedo, Pablo Bravo Barra
Microorganisms
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
article

Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review

Andrés M. Vélez-Pereira, David J. O’Connor, Yiniva Camargo Caicedo, Pablo Bravo Barra
article en

Abstract

Bioaerosol emissions from biological treatment processes like composting, livestock operations, and wastewater plants pose notable occupational and environmental health risks. Biofiltration is a common mitigation measure for gaseous pollutants, but its effectiveness in controlling bioaerosols is less studied. This review synthesizes current evidence on biofiltration for the removal of bioaerosols. Findings indicate that biofiltration can significantly reduce emissions from waste-related biological processes, although results vary widely and depend heavily on design and operational factors. In composting, agricultural, and wastewater treatment contexts, fungal bioaerosols are consistently removed with high efficiency, often over 90%. Conversely, bacterial removal shows greater variability, from negligible to above 90%, influenced primarily by airflow rate, bed depth, and media stability. Systems with residence times of tens of seconds and bed depths of at least 1 m tend to reliably reduce bacterial counts, whereas undersized, high-flow systems experience marked efficiency losses. The choice of packing material is also crucial; mature, stable media maintain performance, whereas nutrient-rich or unstable substrates can lead to fungal emissions, turning the biofilter into a secondary source. Data on endotoxin removal are limited and remain insufficient for firm design recommendations. Overall, biofiltration’s effectiveness depends on complex interactions among physical retention, biological stability, and design. These insights emphasize the need for future research to focus on standardized, performance-based design criteria supported by consistent reporting and full-scale validation.

MicroorganismsVol. 14(5)
University of Tarapacá (CL), University of Magdalena (CO), Dublin City University (IE)
Universidad del Magdalena
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.