Impact of the diagnosis-to-treatment interval on the survival of patients with CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

We analyzed the impact of the diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on survival in patients with CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CD5 + DLBCL), using a data set of newly diagnosed patients. Among the 336 eligible patients, 247 (74%) received R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), and 89 (26%) were treated with dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisolone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab). The median DTI was 18 days (range 0–118). The short DTI (≤ 14 days) group included 135 patients (40%), and the long DTI (> 14 days) group included 201 patients (60%). Compared with the long DTI group, the short DTI group had more aggressive disease characteristics. Both the progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.01) and the overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group compared with those in the long DTI group. Among 89 patients who received DA-EPOCH-R, no significant differences in PFS (P = 0.92) or OS (P = 0.86) were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that no DA-EPOCH-R was a risk factor for PFS in the short DTI group (P = 0.06). A short DTI was a negative prognostic factor in our CD5 + DLBCL cohort. DA-EPOCH-R could be considered a potential treatment option for patients with a short DTI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hematology
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-07021-0
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the diagnosis-to-treatment interval on the survival of patients with CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Kana Miyazaki, Eiju Negoro, Koji Izutsu, Yuma Nato et al.
Annals of Hematology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Impact of the diagnosis-to-treatment interval on the survival of patients with CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Kana Miyazaki, Eiju Negoro, Koji Izutsu, Yuma Nato, Kazutaka Sunami, Motoko Yamaguchi, Junji Hiraga, Momoko Nishikori, Taro Masunari, Ilseung Choi, Nobuyuki Takayama, Yuri Miyazawa, Satsuki Murakami, Kohtaro Toyama, Koji Kato, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Masahiro Yoshida, Tohru Murayama, Takahiro Okada, Isao Tawara, Naoto Tomita, Yuto Kaneda, Ritsuro Suzuki, Naoko Asano, Naoki Takahashi, Jun Takizawa, Dai Maruyama, Koichi Ohshima, Shuji Momose
article en

Abstract

We analyzed the impact of the diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on survival in patients with CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CD5 + DLBCL), using a data set of newly diagnosed patients. Among the 336 eligible patients, 247 (74%) received R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), and 89 (26%) were treated with dose-adjusted (DA)-EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisolone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab). The median DTI was 18 days (range 0–118). The short DTI (≤ 14 days) group included 135 patients (40%), and the long DTI (> 14 days) group included 201 patients (60%). Compared with the long DTI group, the short DTI group had more aggressive disease characteristics. Both the progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.01) and the overall survival (OS) (P < 0.01) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group compared with those in the long DTI group. Among 89 patients who received DA-EPOCH-R, no significant differences in PFS (P = 0.92) or OS (P = 0.86) were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that no DA-EPOCH-R was a risk factor for PFS in the short DTI group (P = 0.06). A short DTI was a negative prognostic factor in our CD5 + DLBCL cohort. DA-EPOCH-R could be considered a potential treatment option for patients with a short DTI.

Annals of HematologyVol. 105(5)
Kurume University (JP), University of Fukui (JP), Kyushu University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Aichi Medical University (JP), Gunma University (JP), Shimane University (JP), Mie University (JP), Kyorin University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP), National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP), Nagano Prefectural Suzaka Hospital (JP), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Gifu University Hospital (JP), Chugoku Central Hospital (JP), Toyota Kosei Hospital (JP), Okayama Medical Center (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), Hyogo Prefectural Cancer Center (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP), Kanagawa Cancer Center, Niigata University (JP), Saitama Medical University (JP)
Mie University, Kanazawa Medical University, Shimane University, University of Fukui, Fujita Health University, Nagoya City University, Saitama Medical University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.