Implementation status and barriers to multimodal management of low back pain among physical therapists: A cross-sectional study

This study aimed to investigate the implementation of multimodal assessments and interventions for low back pain (LBP) among physical therapists and identify the reasons and participants’ background characteristics associated with non-implementation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among members of the Ishikawa Physical Therapy Association in Japan with clinical experience in managing patients with LBP. A total of 140 valid responses were analyzed. The questionnaire included multiple-choice items on respondent and patient characteristics, awareness of LBP-related factors (five domains: biomechanical, psychological, social, lifestyle, and metabolic; 18 sub-items), implementation and reasons for non-implementation of assessments and interventions, and types of interventions provided. Comparisons among the five domains showed that awareness and implementation were significantly higher for biomechanical factors than for the other domains, whereas for psychological and metabolic factors, they were significantly lower. The main reasons for non-implementation were a lack of knowledge or skills, limited time, and delegation to other professionals. Discriminant analysis showed that these reasons varied depending on work setting and patient characteristics. These findings suggest that physical therapy for LBP tends to focus on biomechanical factors, whereas psychological, lifestyle, and metabolic perspectives are less frequently integrated into practice. The results also indicate that educational and organizational factors, along with role boundaries and interprofessional considerations, may influence how these domains are addressed in clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50076-2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation status and barriers to multimodal management of low back pain among physical therapists: A cross-sectional study

Akio Goda, Masahiro Noguchi, Sachiko Madokoro, Takashi Kitagawa et al.
Scientific Reports
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Implementation status and barriers to multimodal management of low back pain among physical therapists: A cross-sectional study

Akio Goda, Masahiro Noguchi, Sachiko Madokoro, Takashi Kitagawa, Ryo Miyachi, Koshi Shimizu, Yayoi Kojima, Kentaro Mori, Yuji Kanazawa, Hisashi Narimiya, Takaaki Nishimura
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the implementation of multimodal assessments and interventions for low back pain (LBP) among physical therapists and identify the reasons and participants’ background characteristics associated with non-implementation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among members of the Ishikawa Physical Therapy Association in Japan with clinical experience in managing patients with LBP. A total of 140 valid responses were analyzed. The questionnaire included multiple-choice items on respondent and patient characteristics, awareness of LBP-related factors (five domains: biomechanical, psychological, social, lifestyle, and metabolic; 18 sub-items), implementation and reasons for non-implementation of assessments and interventions, and types of interventions provided. Comparisons among the five domains showed that awareness and implementation were significantly higher for biomechanical factors than for the other domains, whereas for psychological and metabolic factors, they were significantly lower. The main reasons for non-implementation were a lack of knowledge or skills, limited time, and delegation to other professionals. Discriminant analysis showed that these reasons varied depending on work setting and patient characteristics. These findings suggest that physical therapy for LBP tends to focus on biomechanical factors, whereas psychological, lifestyle, and metabolic perspectives are less frequently integrated into practice. The results also indicate that educational and organizational factors, along with role boundaries and interprofessional considerations, may influence how these domains are addressed in clinical settings.

Scientific Reports
Kanazawa University (JP), Shinshu University (JP), Keiyu Orthopedic Hospital (JP), Kanazawa Hospital (JP), Hokuriku University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.