Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Pain Syndromes

Background and Objectives: Functional neurosurgery encompasses surgical interventions aimed at modulating the function of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), as a form of neuromodulation, is an established treatment for chronic pain and is increasingly utilized by both anesthesiologists and neurosurgeons. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in patients with chronic neuropathic spinal pain. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 42 patients who demonstrated a positive response to trial stimulation. Only patients achieving a clinically meaningful response (≥50% pain reduction) during the trial phase were included in the final analysis. Pain intensity and functional disability were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All patients underwent a two-stage percutaneous implantation procedure using burst stimulation. A follow-up assessment was performed 3–6 months after implantation. Results: A statistically significant reduction in pain intensity was observed (p < 0.0001), with median VAS scores decreasing from 8 to 3, corresponding to a 62.5% reduction in pain intensity and exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS. Functional status improved significantly, with ODI scores decreasing from 74% to 38%, markedly surpassing the established MCID threshold. A clinically meaningful reduction in pain (≥50%) was achieved in the majority of patients. All patients requiring opioid analgesics at baseline discontinued their use following SCS implantation, and a reduction in overall analgesic consumption was observed across the cohort. Conclusions: These findings suggest that burst SCS may be an effective treatment option for carefully selected patients with chronic neuropathic spinal pain who are not candidates for conventional spine surgery. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the enriched study design and limited follow-up period.