An International Phase 4 Study of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Final Analysis

Introduction: The phase 3 REFLECT trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We report results from STELLAR, a non-interventional post-marketing study. The primary objectives were to characterize hepatotoxicity and overall safety of lenvatinib in patients from Western regions with uHCC. Methods: STELLAR was a prospective, open-label, observational, phase 4 study of patients treated with lenvatinib (n = 193). A cohort of sorafenib-treated patients (n = 123) was included as an internal reference group. The treating physician made the decision to treat patients with lenvatinib or sorafenib before enrollment. Study drugs were administered according to the Summary of Product Characteristics guidelines. Safety and efficacy evaluations were performed according to standard clinical practice at each site. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included treatment exposure and overall survival. Results: The median duration of treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib was 6.5 months (range, 0.2–33.1 months) and 4.4 months (range, 0.5–30.7 months), respectively. Hepatotoxicity treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 26.9% of lenvatinib-treated patients and 33.3% of sorafenib-treated patients. The most frequently reported hepatotoxicity TEAEs were hepatic encephalopathy (7.8%; lenvatinib cohort) and ascites (11.4%; sorafenib cohort), respectively. Overall, 85.0% of lenvatinib-treated patients and 84.6% of sorafenib-treated patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Median OS (95% CI) was 16.9 months (14.1–not estimable) in lenvatinib-treated patients. Conclusion: Our findings support the established safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in first-line patients with uHCC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Cancer
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000552115
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An International Phase 4 Study of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Final Analysis

José Luis Lledó-Navarro, Arndt Weinmann, Hakim Saal, Chinyere E. Okpara et al.
Liver Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

An International Phase 4 Study of Lenvatinib and Sorafenib in Real-World Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Final Analysis

José Luis Lledó-Navarro, Arndt Weinmann, Hakim Saal, Chinyere E. Okpara, José Presa, Edward Mena, Alessandro Granito, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Tim Meyer, Lipika Goyal, Yuk Ting, Markus Peck‐Radosavljevic, Antonio Gasbarrini, Dirk‐Thomas Waldschmidt, Akhmed Abdelgafur, Min Ren, Adriano Pellicelli, Miriam T. Levy
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The phase 3 REFLECT trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We report results from STELLAR, a non-interventional post-marketing study. The primary objectives were to characterize hepatotoxicity and overall safety of lenvatinib in patients from Western regions with uHCC. Methods: STELLAR was a prospective, open-label, observational, phase 4 study of patients treated with lenvatinib (n = 193). A cohort of sorafenib-treated patients (n = 123) was included as an internal reference group. The treating physician made the decision to treat patients with lenvatinib or sorafenib before enrollment. Study drugs were administered according to the Summary of Product Characteristics guidelines. Safety and efficacy evaluations were performed according to standard clinical practice at each site. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included treatment exposure and overall survival. Results: The median duration of treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib was 6.5 months (range, 0.2–33.1 months) and 4.4 months (range, 0.5–30.7 months), respectively. Hepatotoxicity treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 26.9% of lenvatinib-treated patients and 33.3% of sorafenib-treated patients. The most frequently reported hepatotoxicity TEAEs were hepatic encephalopathy (7.8%; lenvatinib cohort) and ascites (11.4%; sorafenib cohort), respectively. Overall, 85.0% of lenvatinib-treated patients and 84.6% of sorafenib-treated patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Median OS (95% CI) was 16.9 months (14.1–not estimable) in lenvatinib-treated patients. Conclusion: Our findings support the established safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in first-line patients with uHCC.

Liver Cancer
Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Aarhus Universitet, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, BeiGene, Incyte, Eisai, Ipsen, Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.