Educational outcomes and resilience in higher education during COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes in higher education, not only through the sudden shift to fully remote education but also through the responses of households, institutions, and families. Using repeated cross-sectional student-level data from 2016 to 2022, the analysis estimates linear regression models to capture changes resulting from the pandemic crisis and the recovery of the higher education system in Columbia. The analysis examines changes in standardized test performance across multiple domains and incorporates students’ prior achievement to assess value-added learning. The findings reveal that inequalities in human capital accumulation have widened: affluent students improved their educational outcomes, whereas less advantaged students experienced declines two years after the closures. Women generally experienced greater losses than men, except in reading, where they showed greater resilience. Students in disciplines that depend heavily on experiential, hands-on learning, such as sports, the arts, architecture, and engineering, were the most affected and recovered the slowest, largely because remote instruction constrained access to practical training, specialized facilities, and competency-based activities essential to their programs. Overall, the results highlight the distinct implications of the pandemic and the uneven pace of resilience across students’ characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2026.2653291
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational outcomes and resilience in higher education during COVID-19

Louis Volante, José Wilmar Quintero Peña, Kristof De Witte
Cogent Education
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Educational outcomes and resilience in higher education during COVID-19

Louis Volante, José Wilmar Quintero Peña, Kristof De Witte
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes in higher education, not only through the sudden shift to fully remote education but also through the responses of households, institutions, and families. Using repeated cross-sectional student-level data from 2016 to 2022, the analysis estimates linear regression models to capture changes resulting from the pandemic crisis and the recovery of the higher education system in Columbia. The analysis examines changes in standardized test performance across multiple domains and incorporates students’ prior achievement to assess value-added learning. The findings reveal that inequalities in human capital accumulation have widened: affluent students improved their educational outcomes, whereas less advantaged students experienced declines two years after the closures. Women generally experienced greater losses than men, except in reading, where they showed greater resilience. Students in disciplines that depend heavily on experiential, hands-on learning, such as sports, the arts, architecture, and engineering, were the most affected and recovered the slowest, largely because remote instruction constrained access to practical training, specialized facilities, and competency-based activities essential to their programs. Overall, the results highlight the distinct implications of the pandemic and the uneven pace of resilience across students’ characteristics.

Cogent EducationVol. 13(1)
Brock University (CA), Maastricht University (NL), Bocconi University (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.