Comparative Study on Injection Molding and Performance of Glass Fiber-Reinforced PET and PA6 Thermoplastic Insulators

In ultra-high-voltage GIS and GIL systems, epoxy resin insulators are still the mainstream choice. However, as a thermosetting material, epoxy resin is difficult to recycle after disposal, which limits its environmental benefits. Thermoplastic insulators, due to their recyclability, are potential alternatives. This study focuses on 30% glass fiber-reinforced PET and PA6 materials. Their injection molding behavior, hydraulic pressure performance, and insulation performance were systematically analyzed using Moldflow, ANSYS, and COMSOL, respectively. For injection molding, Moldflow simulations were conducted for filling, packing, and cooling stages. Melt temperature was varied from 260 to –310 °C (PET) and 250–300 °C (PA6), while mold temperature was varied from 80 to –130 °C (PET) and 70–120 °C (PA6). An optimization objective function, Y = Δp/20 + Δx/0.5 + Δs/1.8, was developed to determine optimal processing parameters. Based on this function, the optimal parameters identified are: PET at 290 °C melt temperature and 120 °C mold temperature; PA6 at 250 °C melt temperature and 70 °C mold temperature. For hydraulic testing, Moldflow–ANSYS coupled simulations were performed under 2.4 MPa pressure with the compliance criteria of bulk stress < 90 MPa and insert-contact stress < 20 MPa. PA6 passed within a processing window of melt temperature < 270 °C and mold temperature < 120 °C. PET failed under all tested conditions, with insert-contact stress ranging from 24.25 to 27.55 MPa, consistently exceeding the 20 MPa threshold. In terms of insulation performance, this paper utilizes COMSOL to study the electric field distribution of thermoplastic insulators in SF6 GIS/GIL and provides optimization suggestions for insulator geometry design. This study systematically compares the injection molding processes and hydraulic pressure performance of PET and PA6 thermoplastic insulators. These results provide important process insights and design guidance for evaluating thermoplastic materials as potential alternatives to epoxy resin in GIS/GIL applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091729
Primary Topic
Injection Molding Process and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on Injection Molding and Performance of Glass Fiber-Reinforced PET and PA6 Thermoplastic Insulators

Zehao Zhang, Xiaofei Chen, Yue Wang, Weiqi Qin et al.
Materials
Injection Molding Process and Properties
article

Comparative Study on Injection Molding and Performance of Glass Fiber-Reinforced PET and PA6 Thermoplastic Insulators

Zehao Zhang, Xiaofei Chen, Yue Wang, Weiqi Qin, Yuliang Fu
article en

Abstract

In ultra-high-voltage GIS and GIL systems, epoxy resin insulators are still the mainstream choice. However, as a thermosetting material, epoxy resin is difficult to recycle after disposal, which limits its environmental benefits. Thermoplastic insulators, due to their recyclability, are potential alternatives. This study focuses on 30% glass fiber-reinforced PET and PA6 materials. Their injection molding behavior, hydraulic pressure performance, and insulation performance were systematically analyzed using Moldflow, ANSYS, and COMSOL, respectively. For injection molding, Moldflow simulations were conducted for filling, packing, and cooling stages. Melt temperature was varied from 260 to –310 °C (PET) and 250–300 °C (PA6), while mold temperature was varied from 80 to –130 °C (PET) and 70–120 °C (PA6). An optimization objective function, Y = Δp/20 + Δx/0.5 + Δs/1.8, was developed to determine optimal processing parameters. Based on this function, the optimal parameters identified are: PET at 290 °C melt temperature and 120 °C mold temperature; PA6 at 250 °C melt temperature and 70 °C mold temperature. For hydraulic testing, Moldflow–ANSYS coupled simulations were performed under 2.4 MPa pressure with the compliance criteria of bulk stress < 90 MPa and insert-contact stress < 20 MPa. PA6 passed within a processing window of melt temperature < 270 °C and mold temperature < 120 °C. PET failed under all tested conditions, with insert-contact stress ranging from 24.25 to 27.55 MPa, consistently exceeding the 20 MPa threshold. In terms of insulation performance, this paper utilizes COMSOL to study the electric field distribution of thermoplastic insulators in SF6 GIS/GIL and provides optimization suggestions for insulator geometry design. This study systematically compares the injection molding processes and hydraulic pressure performance of PET and PA6 thermoplastic insulators. These results provide important process insights and design guidance for evaluating thermoplastic materials as potential alternatives to epoxy resin in GIS/GIL applications.

MaterialsVol. 19(9)
Taishan University (CN), Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Science and Technology Major Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Injection Molding Process and Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.