Dynamic associations between emotion regulation, mental fatigue, and stress: An ecological momentary assessment study

The use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies, including distraction or reappraisal, is influenced by dynamic factors such as mental fatigue and stress. Mental fatigue arises from cognitive effort, including the exertion required for effortful ER, and accumulates with repeated effort. Stress also influences ER by altering emotion intensity and goals. While ER strategies are essential for self-regulation, some may increase mental fatigue and stress, heightening the risk of emotional extremes or dysregulation that may adversely impact daily life. However, the bidirectional associations between ER strategies and mental fatigue and stress remain unclear. This study examined these relationships at the within-person level using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), with surveys administered approximately 3 h apart. Specifically, this study investigated whether (1) ER strategy selection predicts mental fatigue and stress, (2) mental fatigue and stress predict ER strategy selection, and (3) the number of ER strategies implemented predicts mental fatigue. Between March and July 2024, 179 adults (74% women), aged 18-35, completed up to four EMA surveys daily over 28 days (total surveys = 10,984), reporting momentary ER strategy use, mental fatigue, and stress. Results revealed that distraction as an ER strategy was frequently used and bidirectionally predicted increases in both mental fatigue and stress, suggesting potential maladaptive effects for some people. While stress was associated with increased use of most ER strategies, no ER strategies were associated with decreased stress 3 h later. These findings highlight that considering strategy selection and timing may mitigate maladaptive ER and enhance well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121855
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic associations between emotion regulation, mental fatigue, and stress: An ecological momentary assessment study

Joshua F. Wiley, Erynn Christensen, Eugene Aidman, Murat Yücel et al.
Journal of Affective Disorders
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Dynamic associations between emotion regulation, mental fatigue, and stress: An ecological momentary assessment study

Joshua F. Wiley, Erynn Christensen, Eugene Aidman, Murat Yücel, Rebecca Kirkham, Lucy Albertella, Chang Liu, Catherine Brown, Karyn Richardson
article en

Abstract

The use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies, including distraction or reappraisal, is influenced by dynamic factors such as mental fatigue and stress. Mental fatigue arises from cognitive effort, including the exertion required for effortful ER, and accumulates with repeated effort. Stress also influences ER by altering emotion intensity and goals. While ER strategies are essential for self-regulation, some may increase mental fatigue and stress, heightening the risk of emotional extremes or dysregulation that may adversely impact daily life. However, the bidirectional associations between ER strategies and mental fatigue and stress remain unclear. This study examined these relationships at the within-person level using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), with surveys administered approximately 3 h apart. Specifically, this study investigated whether (1) ER strategy selection predicts mental fatigue and stress, (2) mental fatigue and stress predict ER strategy selection, and (3) the number of ER strategies implemented predicts mental fatigue. Between March and July 2024, 179 adults (74% women), aged 18-35, completed up to four EMA surveys daily over 28 days (total surveys = 10,984), reporting momentary ER strategy use, mental fatigue, and stress. Results revealed that distraction as an ER strategy was frequently used and bidirectionally predicted increases in both mental fatigue and stress, suggesting potential maladaptive effects for some people. While stress was associated with increased use of most ER strategies, no ER strategies were associated with decreased stress 3 h later. These findings highlight that considering strategy selection and timing may mitigate maladaptive ER and enhance well-being.

Journal of Affective DisordersVol. 408
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Deakin University (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Defence Science and Technology Group
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.