Sex-specific differences in post-load insulin dynamics are independent of BMI-based adiposity and BIA-derived body composition and pubertal stage in adolescents with obesity

Sex-related differences in insulin sensitivity during adolescence remain incompletely understood, particularly in the context of obesity. Whether these differencesreflect variations in basal insulin resistance or dynamic insulin responses remains unclear. Objective: To investigate sex differences in glucose and insulin responses duringthe oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to explore mechanisms underlying potential dissociation between glycemic and insulinemic profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 753 adolescents with obesity who underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured at fasting and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mixed-effects models were used to examine glucose and insulin trajectories over time, including sex-by-time interactions, and to adjust for body mass index standard deviation score (BMI_SDS), pubertal stage (Tanner), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and body composition (resistance index). Multiple linear regression models were fitted to assess associations of sex with HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, total area under the curve (AUC), and phase-specific insulin AUCs. Results: Glucose trajectories during OGTT were similar between sexes, with no significant sex or sex-by-time interaction effects after adjustment. In contrast, insulin trajectories differed significantly by sex (sex-by-time interaction β = −0.10, p < 0.001). Boys exhibited higher baseline insulin levels and greater total insulin exposure (β = −11.2, p < 0.001), independent of BMI_SDS, pubertal stage, MetS, and body composition. Sex differences were sustained across all OGTT phases. HOMA-IR did not differ by sex, whereas HOMA-β showed a sex-related difference. BMI was positively associated with both basal and dynamic insulin measures. Conclusions: In adolescents with obesity, sex differences are characterized by altered dynamic insulin responses rather than differences in glycemic control. Boys exhibit greater compensatory insulin exposure during glucose challenge, independent of BMI-based adiposity, BIA-derived body composition and pubertal development. These data cannot be made publicly available as they include sensitive information, but they can be made available upon reasonable request of interested researchers to the corresponding author, who will forward a data transfer agreement request to the relevant Ethical Committee. Requests can be addressed to Dr. Alessandro Sartorio ([email protected]).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19738476
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-specific differences in post-load insulin dynamics are independent of BMI-based adiposity and BIA-derived body composition and pubertal stage in adolescents with obesity

Alessandro Sartorio
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Sex-specific differences in post-load insulin dynamics are independent of BMI-based adiposity and BIA-derived body composition and pubertal stage in adolescents with obesity

Alessandro Sartorio
article en

Abstract

Sex-related differences in insulin sensitivity during adolescence remain incompletely understood, particularly in the context of obesity. Whether these differencesreflect variations in basal insulin resistance or dynamic insulin responses remains unclear. Objective: To investigate sex differences in glucose and insulin responses duringthe oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to explore mechanisms underlying potential dissociation between glycemic and insulinemic profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of 753 adolescents with obesity who underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Plasma glucose and insulin were measured at fasting and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Mixed-effects models were used to examine glucose and insulin trajectories over time, including sex-by-time interactions, and to adjust for body mass index standard deviation score (BMI_SDS), pubertal stage (Tanner), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and body composition (resistance index). Multiple linear regression models were fitted to assess associations of sex with HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, total area under the curve (AUC), and phase-specific insulin AUCs. Results: Glucose trajectories during OGTT were similar between sexes, with no significant sex or sex-by-time interaction effects after adjustment. In contrast, insulin trajectories differed significantly by sex (sex-by-time interaction β = −0.10, p < 0.001). Boys exhibited higher baseline insulin levels and greater total insulin exposure (β = −11.2, p < 0.001), independent of BMI_SDS, pubertal stage, MetS, and body composition. Sex differences were sustained across all OGTT phases. HOMA-IR did not differ by sex, whereas HOMA-β showed a sex-related difference. BMI was positively associated with both basal and dynamic insulin measures. Conclusions: In adolescents with obesity, sex differences are characterized by altered dynamic insulin responses rather than differences in glycemic control. Boys exhibit greater compensatory insulin exposure during glucose challenge, independent of BMI-based adiposity, BIA-derived body composition and pubertal development. These data cannot be made publicly available as they include sensitive information, but they can be made available upon reasonable request of interested researchers to the corresponding author, who will forward a data transfer agreement request to the relevant Ethical Committee. Requests can be addressed to Dr. Alessandro Sartorio ([email protected]).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.