CONTINUOUS QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND THE SATURATED COSMOLOGICAL SUBSTRATE: a critical–propositional analysis of the V5.1 cosmological neutrino-flow hypothesis in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Ricardo Mariano de Oliveira Dias’s Continuous Quantum Entanglement: Interpretive Hypothesis of Cosmological Neutrino Flow V5.1, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity. The study examines the hypothesis that quantum entanglement may indicate an omnipresent saturated cosmological substrate, mainly associated with the cosmic neutrino background, and evaluates its possible compatibilities and tensions with the modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis argues that the cosmic neutrino flow may be interpreted as a phenomenic vector of informational continuity, while the transcendent element, in the Theory of Objectivity, remains the knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article concludes that the neutrino-substrate hypothesis can function as an auxiliary phenomenological model, but not as a replacement for the modal foundation of the Theory of Objectivity. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; quantum entanglement; cosmic neutrino background; saturated cosmological substrate; neutrino flow; nonlocality; dark matter; JWST; Hubble tension; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; modal cosmology; atomic radiation; transcendent element; Ricardo Mariano de Oliveira Dias.