Polygenic risk score and 20-year prostate cancer-specific mortality and survival

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) strongly discriminate for prostate cancer risk at the population level. The role of these genetic scores in determining prostate cancer survival is unclear, potentially due to methodological issues. METHODS: We included 19,607 men from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and analyzed 20-year incidence and mortality (from full cohort analyses) and survival (from case-only analyses) according to a 451-variant PRS. For most of the men included, early access to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was limited. RESULTS: In full cohort analyses, a PRS at or above the median (vs. below the median) shows a strong association with prostate cancer incidence (hazard ratio (HR) 3.02, 95% CI 2.78-3.28) and, somewhat stronger, with prostate cancer mortality (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.63-4.04). As expected, case-only survival analyses of prostate cancer death show a similar direction (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.50), which becomes stronger when excluding variants linked to PSA (HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.01-1.54), in particular in the age group 65-74 years at diagnosis (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45). In the other age groups, HRs are close to or below 1. This indicates that standard case-only survival estimates may not accurately reflect risk across age, consistent with age-dependent selection mechanisms, and further points to an influence from disease detection. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings support that inherited genetic risk captured by the 451-variant PRS may have an influence on prostate cancer survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Medicine
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01603-9
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polygenic risk score and 20-year prostate cancer-specific mortality and survival

Fredrik Wiklund, Aris Baras, Anna Plym, Konrad Hermann Stopsack et al.
Communications Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Polygenic risk score and 20-year prostate cancer-specific mortality and survival

Fredrik Wiklund, Aris Baras, Anna Plym, Konrad Hermann Stopsack, Isabel Drake, Edward Giovannucci, Anqi Wang, Lorelei A. Mucci, Adam S. Kibel, Yiwen Zhang, Mark Clements, Kathryn L. Penney
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) strongly discriminate for prostate cancer risk at the population level. The role of these genetic scores in determining prostate cancer survival is unclear, potentially due to methodological issues. METHODS: We included 19,607 men from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and analyzed 20-year incidence and mortality (from full cohort analyses) and survival (from case-only analyses) according to a 451-variant PRS. For most of the men included, early access to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing was limited. RESULTS: In full cohort analyses, a PRS at or above the median (vs. below the median) shows a strong association with prostate cancer incidence (hazard ratio (HR) 3.02, 95% CI 2.78-3.28) and, somewhat stronger, with prostate cancer mortality (HR 3.26, 95% CI 2.63-4.04). As expected, case-only survival analyses of prostate cancer death show a similar direction (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.50), which becomes stronger when excluding variants linked to PSA (HR 1.25, 95% CI, 1.01-1.54), in particular in the age group 65-74 years at diagnosis (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45). In the other age groups, HRs are close to or below 1. This indicates that standard case-only survival estimates may not accurately reflect risk across age, consistent with age-dependent selection mechanisms, and further points to an influence from disease detection. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings support that inherited genetic risk captured by the 451-variant PRS may have an influence on prostate cancer survival.

Communications MedicineVol. 6(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Regeneron (United States) (US), Lund University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Prostate Cancer Foundation, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Cancerfonden, Lunds Universitet, Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning, Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Cancer Institute
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.