Implementation and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Use in Practice and Research

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into nutrition research and practice; however, the extent of its clinical integration and impact on health outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review evaluated how AI-based systems have been implemented in human nutritional interventions and summarized reported outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SpringerLink, JMIR, and MDPI were searched from January 2020 to March 2025 (search completed in March 2025). Randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies published in English or Spanish were included if they evaluated AI-driven nutritional interventions in human populations and reported health-related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. A qualitative synthesis was performed. Results: Sixteen studies involving 10,863 participants were included. Most were randomized controlled trials targeting metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity. Eleven studies evaluated metabolic outcomes, including HbA1c, body weight, fat mass, lipid levels, and insulin resistance indices. Six studies assessed gastrointestinal symptom severity scores, and two examined quality-of-life or patient-reported outcomes. Several trials reported short-term improvements favoring AI-supported interventions in glycemic control, weight reduction, and symptom severity. However, effects were heterogeneous and often observed within multimodal programs, limiting attribution of outcomes solely to the AI component. Conclusions: AI integration in nutrition remains in an early phase of clinical implementation. Although preliminary findings suggest potential benefits, interpretation should be cautious given methodological heterogeneity and moderate-to-high risk of bias across studies. Larger, rigorously designed investigations are required to determine sustained clinical effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18091340
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Use in Practice and Research

M. Elizabeth Tejero, Marlen Naranjo-Martínez, Alexa Zagorin-Djaddah, Celia Fabiola Vásquez-García
Nutrients
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Implementation and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Use in Practice and Research

M. Elizabeth Tejero, Marlen Naranjo-Martínez, Alexa Zagorin-Djaddah, Celia Fabiola Vásquez-García
article en

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly incorporated into nutrition research and practice; however, the extent of its clinical integration and impact on health outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review evaluated how AI-based systems have been implemented in human nutritional interventions and summarized reported outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SpringerLink, JMIR, and MDPI were searched from January 2020 to March 2025 (search completed in March 2025). Randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies published in English or Spanish were included if they evaluated AI-driven nutritional interventions in human populations and reported health-related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. A qualitative synthesis was performed. Results: Sixteen studies involving 10,863 participants were included. Most were randomized controlled trials targeting metabolic disorders, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity. Eleven studies evaluated metabolic outcomes, including HbA1c, body weight, fat mass, lipid levels, and insulin resistance indices. Six studies assessed gastrointestinal symptom severity scores, and two examined quality-of-life or patient-reported outcomes. Several trials reported short-term improvements favoring AI-supported interventions in glycemic control, weight reduction, and symptom severity. However, effects were heterogeneous and often observed within multimodal programs, limiting attribution of outcomes solely to the AI component. Conclusions: AI integration in nutrition remains in an early phase of clinical implementation. Although preliminary findings suggest potential benefits, interpretation should be cautious given methodological heterogeneity and moderate-to-high risk of bias across studies. Larger, rigorously designed investigations are required to determine sustained clinical effectiveness.

NutrientsVol. 18(9)
National Institute of Genomic Medicine (MX), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.