Capacity Strain in US Children’s Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study of Measurement and Mitigation

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of pediatric inpatient care has concentrated demand within children's hospitals and increased concerns about capacity strain. Although hospitals track metrics and deploy mitigation strategies, little is known about how institutions define strain and translate signals into operational decisions. METHODS: We conducted a national mixed-methods study of US children's hospitals. Operational leaders from hospitals receiving Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education funding completed a cross-sectional survey assessing strain metrics, mitigation strategies, and decision drivers. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses. We then interviewed a purposive sample to explore how hospitals interpret metrics and make mitigation decisions. We analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis and integrated findings with survey results. RESULTS: Forty-five of 47 eligible hospitals responded (96%), and 20 leaders completed interviews. Among metrics, occupancy indicators were most common (>98%). However, most hospitals lacked full alignment between metrics identified as important indicators of strain and those used to trigger mitigation. Early strategies included encouraging discharges, activating staff, and opening additional bedspace, whereas diversion or procedure cancellations were implemented later despite being perceived as relatively more effective. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: mismatch between measured capacity and experienced strain; adaptive capacity normalizing chronic strain; institutional commitments to access sustaining exposure to strain; and escalation of strain requiring institutional credibility thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospitals track extensive operational metrics, yet strain recognition and mitigation are shaped by institutional priorities, professional norms, and measurement limitations. Improving strain management may require multidimensional measurement approaches and policy-level changes to strengthen pediatric care infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEDIATRICS
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2026-076834
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity Strain in US Children’s Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study of Measurement and Mitigation

Caryn Kerman, Elizabeth N. Kuhn, Evan S. Fieldston, Sage R. Myers et al.
PEDIATRICS
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Capacity Strain in US Children’s Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Study of Measurement and Mitigation

Caryn Kerman, Elizabeth N. Kuhn, Evan S. Fieldston, Sage R. Myers, Lauren M. McDaniel, Emily Kane, Samuel Gottlieb, Corrie E. McDaniel, Allison Ballantine, Christopher E. Gaw, Elizabeth Salazar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of pediatric inpatient care has concentrated demand within children's hospitals and increased concerns about capacity strain. Although hospitals track metrics and deploy mitigation strategies, little is known about how institutions define strain and translate signals into operational decisions. METHODS: We conducted a national mixed-methods study of US children's hospitals. Operational leaders from hospitals receiving Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education funding completed a cross-sectional survey assessing strain metrics, mitigation strategies, and decision drivers. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses. We then interviewed a purposive sample to explore how hospitals interpret metrics and make mitigation decisions. We analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis and integrated findings with survey results. RESULTS: Forty-five of 47 eligible hospitals responded (96%), and 20 leaders completed interviews. Among metrics, occupancy indicators were most common (>98%). However, most hospitals lacked full alignment between metrics identified as important indicators of strain and those used to trigger mitigation. Early strategies included encouraging discharges, activating staff, and opening additional bedspace, whereas diversion or procedure cancellations were implemented later despite being perceived as relatively more effective. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: mismatch between measured capacity and experienced strain; adaptive capacity normalizing chronic strain; institutional commitments to access sustaining exposure to strain; and escalation of strain requiring institutional credibility thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospitals track extensive operational metrics, yet strain recognition and mitigation are shaped by institutional priorities, professional norms, and measurement limitations. Improving strain management may require multidimensional measurement approaches and policy-level changes to strengthen pediatric care infrastructure.

PEDIATRICS
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US), Philadelphia Department of Public Health (US), Children's Specialized Hospital (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.