SARTRAM: SAR-based trapezoid model for water table depth monitoring in restored peatlands

Remote sensing has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring peatland water table depth (WTD), offering local to global-scale observations and high-frequency monitoring capabilities. We present the first attempt to adapt the trapezoidal model concept to SAR, developing the SAR trapezoid model (SARTRAM) for peatland WTD remote sensing. The model is based on the interpretation of the pixel distribution within the surface backscatter-radar vegetation index (RVI) trapezoid space. We used Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data to evaluate and compare the performance of SARTRAM, surface backscatter ([Formula: see text]) and the traditional optical trapezoid model (OPTRAM) in 29 restored peatlands and 98 WTD logging sites in Scotland and Lithuania. We employed five different model value extraction methods: value at logger point, average buffer value, best-pixel (BP) within the peatland area, BP within 100 m (BP100m) and 500 m (BP500m) search distance buffers. To enhance performance, a moving average window (MAW) filter was applied to SARTRAM. This study demonstrated that SARTRAM exhibited substantial potential, particularly when temporal MAW filtering was applied, resulting in a 10–19% improvement in correlation with WTD compared to the initial SARTRAM results. SAR backscatter showed an average Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.52 and 0.57 with WTD for BP500m and BP methods (VV polarization), respectively. The model with MAW-filtered SARTRAM achieved average Spearman correlation values of 0.65 and 0.62 with the VH and VV polarization data for the BP and BP500m methods, respectively. OPTRAM outperformed SARTRAM across all value extraction method cases, resulting in average correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.83 for the BP and BP500m methods, respectively. Nevertheless, SARTRAM demonstrated slightly better overall results compared to traditional WTD prediction methods based on SAR backscatter signal analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geo-spatial Information Science
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2026.2660547
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SARTRAM: SAR-based trapezoid model for water table depth monitoring in restored peatlands

Leonas Jarašius, Tomas Raila, Laurynas Jukna, Rasa Janušaitė et al.
Geo-spatial Information Science
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
article

SARTRAM: SAR-based trapezoid model for water table depth monitoring in restored peatlands

Leonas Jarašius, Tomas Raila, Laurynas Jukna, Rasa Janušaitė, Elzė Buslavičiūtė
article en

Abstract

Remote sensing has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring peatland water table depth (WTD), offering local to global-scale observations and high-frequency monitoring capabilities. We present the first attempt to adapt the trapezoidal model concept to SAR, developing the SAR trapezoid model (SARTRAM) for peatland WTD remote sensing. The model is based on the interpretation of the pixel distribution within the surface backscatter-radar vegetation index (RVI) trapezoid space. We used Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data to evaluate and compare the performance of SARTRAM, surface backscatter ([Formula: see text]) and the traditional optical trapezoid model (OPTRAM) in 29 restored peatlands and 98 WTD logging sites in Scotland and Lithuania. We employed five different model value extraction methods: value at logger point, average buffer value, best-pixel (BP) within the peatland area, BP within 100 m (BP100m) and 500 m (BP500m) search distance buffers. To enhance performance, a moving average window (MAW) filter was applied to SARTRAM. This study demonstrated that SARTRAM exhibited substantial potential, particularly when temporal MAW filtering was applied, resulting in a 10–19% improvement in correlation with WTD compared to the initial SARTRAM results. SAR backscatter showed an average Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.52 and 0.57 with WTD for BP500m and BP methods (VV polarization), respectively. The model with MAW-filtered SARTRAM achieved average Spearman correlation values of 0.65 and 0.62 with the VH and VV polarization data for the BP and BP500m methods, respectively. OPTRAM outperformed SARTRAM across all value extraction method cases, resulting in average correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.83 for the BP and BP500m methods, respectively. Nevertheless, SARTRAM demonstrated slightly better overall results compared to traditional WTD prediction methods based on SAR backscatter signal analysis.

Geo-spatial Information Science
Vilnius University (LT), Nature Conservation Foundation (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.