The cultural meanings of science and religion: moral and epistemic authority in the United States

Abstract Scholars often associate science and religion with different spheres of authority, linking science to factual knowledge and religion to moral guidance. Yet individuals often blur these boundaries, with some using science as a basis for moral judgment and others turning to religion to understand empirical facts. Using new survey measures and nationally representative data (n = 1516), our latent class analysis identifies five distinctive perspectives on the cultural authority of science and religion. About half of the respondents see either science or religion as a source of both knowledge and values. The rest fall into one of three groups that assign different combinations of moral and intellectual meaning to science and religion. These orientations are strongly associated with views on public policies related to each domain, even after accounting for ideology, religious beliefs, and socio-demographic characteristics. By mapping the cultural meanings that anchor perceptions of science and religion, this article contributes to research on institutional trust, symbolic boundaries, and pluralism in public life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Forces
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soag036
Primary Topic
Evolution and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cultural meanings of science and religion: moral and epistemic authority in the United States

Shiri Noy, Timothy L. O’Brien
Social Forces
Evolution and Science Education
article

The cultural meanings of science and religion: moral and epistemic authority in the United States

Shiri Noy, Timothy L. O’Brien
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scholars often associate science and religion with different spheres of authority, linking science to factual knowledge and religion to moral guidance. Yet individuals often blur these boundaries, with some using science as a basis for moral judgment and others turning to religion to understand empirical facts. Using new survey measures and nationally representative data (n = 1516), our latent class analysis identifies five distinctive perspectives on the cultural authority of science and religion. About half of the respondents see either science or religion as a source of both knowledge and values. The rest fall into one of three groups that assign different combinations of moral and intellectual meaning to science and religion. These orientations are strongly associated with views on public policies related to each domain, even after accounting for ideology, religious beliefs, and socio-demographic characteristics. By mapping the cultural meanings that anchor perceptions of science and religion, this article contributes to research on institutional trust, symbolic boundaries, and pluralism in public life.

Social Forces
Denison University (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evolution and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The cultural meanings of science and religion: moral and epistemic authority in the United States — Shiri Noy, Timothy L. O’Brien · Social Forces (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS