Reforming criminal justice in Bangladesh through technology: Comparative insights from e-justice models in India, the UK, and the US

This scientific and research-based paper took a qualitative and doctrinal approach to analysing the possibility for reforming Bangladesh’s criminal justice system through the systematic use of technology. The study was based on the recognition that Bangladesh’s criminal justice system is hampered by pervasive delays, inefficiency, and accessibility issues, which create strong hurdles to justice and contribute to a decline in public confidence. This paper viewed the use of e-justice as a scientific challenge in institutional modernisation and legal integration, requiring comparative analysis and context-sensitive adjustments. The key argument proposed is that digital change, when guided by comprehensive legislative frameworks and institutional preparedness, may be a powerful facilitator of criminal justice system reform. The study extracted scalable, legally acceptable, and context-relevant mechanisms that may drive Bangladesh’s reform effort through a comparative analysis of lessons learnt from India, the United Kingdom, and the United States, all of which have adopted distinct e-justice frameworks. The objective of this study was to provide an evidence-based, whole-of-government roadmap for Bangladesh’s adoption of e-justice, with a focus on law reform, digital infrastructure, institution building, and accessible justice for marginalised people. The study included a comparative investigation of law and combined law, policy, and technology. Combining doctrinal and comparative insights, the study contributed to the area of knowledge on legal digitalisation in the Global South and provided policymakers, judicial authorities, and development partners with practical advice. It showed how contextually appropriate technological reforms can improve public trust, uphold human rights, and strengthen procedural justice, offering a roadmap for the long-term, technologically driven reform of criminal justice system of Bangladesh

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63341/naia-chasopis/1.2026.32
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming criminal justice in Bangladesh through technology: Comparative insights from e-justice models in India, the UK, and the US

Md Sohel Rana
Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Reforming criminal justice in Bangladesh through technology: Comparative insights from e-justice models in India, the UK, and the US

Md Sohel Rana
article en

Abstract

This scientific and research-based paper took a qualitative and doctrinal approach to analysing the possibility for reforming Bangladesh’s criminal justice system through the systematic use of technology. The study was based on the recognition that Bangladesh’s criminal justice system is hampered by pervasive delays, inefficiency, and accessibility issues, which create strong hurdles to justice and contribute to a decline in public confidence. This paper viewed the use of e-justice as a scientific challenge in institutional modernisation and legal integration, requiring comparative analysis and context-sensitive adjustments. The key argument proposed is that digital change, when guided by comprehensive legislative frameworks and institutional preparedness, may be a powerful facilitator of criminal justice system reform. The study extracted scalable, legally acceptable, and context-relevant mechanisms that may drive Bangladesh’s reform effort through a comparative analysis of lessons learnt from India, the United Kingdom, and the United States, all of which have adopted distinct e-justice frameworks. The objective of this study was to provide an evidence-based, whole-of-government roadmap for Bangladesh’s adoption of e-justice, with a focus on law reform, digital infrastructure, institution building, and accessible justice for marginalised people. The study included a comparative investigation of law and combined law, policy, and technology. Combining doctrinal and comparative insights, the study contributed to the area of knowledge on legal digitalisation in the Global South and provided policymakers, judicial authorities, and development partners with practical advice. It showed how contextually appropriate technological reforms can improve public trust, uphold human rights, and strengthen procedural justice, offering a roadmap for the long-term, technologically driven reform of criminal justice system of Bangladesh

Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh spravVol. 16(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reforming criminal justice in Bangladesh through technology: Comparative insights from e-justice models in India, the UK, and the US — Md Sohel Rana · Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS