The Quantitative Haemodynamic Effect of Levosimendan, Dobutamine and Milrinone in Heart Failure Patients: a Meta-Analysis

AIMS: Inotropic therapy is a cornerstone of medical treatment for patients with low-output heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the quantitative effect of specific inotropic drugs on invasive haemodynamics. METHODS: This meta-analysis assessed the haemodynamic effects of dobutamine, levosimendan, and milrinone in patients with low-output HF. Only studies using invasive haemodynamic assessment were included. The primary outcome was the quantitative change in variables such as cardiac index (CI), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance (PVR and SVR) before and after administration of each drug. Quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool (NIH-QAT). A sensitivity analysis compared the effect on acute versus chronic HF populations. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (n=1,888 patients) were included in the analyses. Based on the NIH-QAT checklist, 11 studies were at low risk of bias, 14 at moderate risk, and 1 at high risk. Meta-analysis showed that all the study drugs improved the haemodynamic variables assessed, without significant differences amongst them, except for MAP (p = 0.0486). Dobutamine and levosimendan caused a non-significant increase in MAP, while milrinone showed a trend toward a reduction in MAP (-3.46 (-7.27 to +0.35)). The heterogeneity across studies was high. In the sensitivity analysis, dobutamine improved CI more than levosimendan in patients with chronic HF. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inotropes improves haemodynamic status in patients with low-output HF, with no consistent superiority of one agent over the others. These findings support the current clinical practice of agent selection based on individual patient characteristics. Head-to-head trials in well-phenotyped HF populations are warranted to guide personalised inotrope use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESC Heart Failure
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag120
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Quantitative Haemodynamic Effect of Levosimendan, Dobutamine and Milrinone in Heart Failure Patients: a Meta-Analysis

Vincenzo Nuzzi, Giuseppe Maria Raffa, Roberto Lorusso, Cristina Madaudo et al.
ESC Heart Failure
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

The Quantitative Haemodynamic Effect of Levosimendan, Dobutamine and Milrinone in Heart Failure Patients: a Meta-Analysis

Vincenzo Nuzzi, Giuseppe Maria Raffa, Roberto Lorusso, Cristina Madaudo, Stefano Cannata, Calogera Pisano, Massimiliano Mulè, Eluisa La Franca, A Cannata, Paolo Manca, Manlio Cipriani
article en

Abstract

AIMS: Inotropic therapy is a cornerstone of medical treatment for patients with low-output heart failure (HF). We aimed to investigate the quantitative effect of specific inotropic drugs on invasive haemodynamics. METHODS: This meta-analysis assessed the haemodynamic effects of dobutamine, levosimendan, and milrinone in patients with low-output HF. Only studies using invasive haemodynamic assessment were included. The primary outcome was the quantitative change in variables such as cardiac index (CI), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance (PVR and SVR) before and after administration of each drug. Quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool (NIH-QAT). A sensitivity analysis compared the effect on acute versus chronic HF populations. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (n=1,888 patients) were included in the analyses. Based on the NIH-QAT checklist, 11 studies were at low risk of bias, 14 at moderate risk, and 1 at high risk. Meta-analysis showed that all the study drugs improved the haemodynamic variables assessed, without significant differences amongst them, except for MAP (p = 0.0486). Dobutamine and levosimendan caused a non-significant increase in MAP, while milrinone showed a trend toward a reduction in MAP (-3.46 (-7.27 to +0.35)). The heterogeneity across studies was high. In the sensitivity analysis, dobutamine improved CI more than levosimendan in patients with chronic HF. CONCLUSIONS: The use of inotropes improves haemodynamic status in patients with low-output HF, with no consistent superiority of one agent over the others. These findings support the current clinical practice of agent selection based on individual patient characteristics. Head-to-head trials in well-phenotyped HF populations are warranted to guide personalised inotrope use.

ESC Heart Failure
King's College London (GB), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), King's College School (GB), University of Palermo (AR), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.