Practical Evaluations of Vendor AI Tools

The developmental pace of Artificial Intelligence technologies is rapid, with numerous library vendors adding AI tools to their products over the past two years. We will examine a few categories of these features, from tools that translate free text queries into faceted advanced searches to fully-fledged research assistants. With a basic understanding of the types of AI in use at libraries, we will review prominent AI evaluation frameworks. We will investigate library-specific rubrics such as the Ethical AI Assessment Tool from San Diego State University as well as more generic frameworks. Evaluating AI tools is important because they do not come without risk. We will review the major categories of concern: AI data centers consume inordinate amounts of water and electricity; systems trained on biased data tend to reproduce societal biases in their output; AI tools are often employed to undermine or threaten the livelihood of workers; some training data was compiled with massive and systemic copyright violation as evidenced by the Bartz v. Anthropic settlement; the output of AI tools is stochastic, opaque, and occasionally contains "hallucinations"; overeliance on AI can lead to cognitive decay or, in extreme cases, emotional disturbance; and corporate ownership over AI technology has little transparency and regulation. The pertinence of these concerns will vary across libraries and AI platforms. We will filter our evaluatory tactics through the lens of your library's values. In particular, we will heed the amount of labor necessary to evaluate new offerings so we can scale the work appropriately. It is impractical for a small library to navigate a twenty-point rubric every time a vendor announces a new AI-powered feature, but by publishing and reusing evaluations libraries benefit from the strength of our professional community. Finally, this session will also discuss the nascent AI Refusal movement in libraries and consider whether it is right for you. AI Refusal rejects all usage of generative AI technology, citing the numerous harmful consequences mentioned earlier.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19742481
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Evaluations of Vendor AI Tools

Eric Phetteplace, Daniel Ransom
Open MIND
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Practical Evaluations of Vendor AI Tools

Eric Phetteplace, Daniel Ransom
article en

Abstract

The developmental pace of Artificial Intelligence technologies is rapid, with numerous library vendors adding AI tools to their products over the past two years. We will examine a few categories of these features, from tools that translate free text queries into faceted advanced searches to fully-fledged research assistants. With a basic understanding of the types of AI in use at libraries, we will review prominent AI evaluation frameworks. We will investigate library-specific rubrics such as the Ethical AI Assessment Tool from San Diego State University as well as more generic frameworks. Evaluating AI tools is important because they do not come without risk. We will review the major categories of concern: AI data centers consume inordinate amounts of water and electricity; systems trained on biased data tend to reproduce societal biases in their output; AI tools are often employed to undermine or threaten the livelihood of workers; some training data was compiled with massive and systemic copyright violation as evidenced by the Bartz v. Anthropic settlement; the output of AI tools is stochastic, opaque, and occasionally contains "hallucinations"; overeliance on AI can lead to cognitive decay or, in extreme cases, emotional disturbance; and corporate ownership over AI technology has little transparency and regulation. The pertinence of these concerns will vary across libraries and AI platforms. We will filter our evaluatory tactics through the lens of your library's values. In particular, we will heed the amount of labor necessary to evaluate new offerings so we can scale the work appropriately. It is impractical for a small library to navigate a twenty-point rubric every time a vendor announces a new AI-powered feature, but by publishing and reusing evaluations libraries benefit from the strength of our professional community. Finally, this session will also discuss the nascent AI Refusal movement in libraries and consider whether it is right for you. AI Refusal rejects all usage of generative AI technology, citing the numerous harmful consequences mentioned earlier.

Open MIND
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.