Effect of optical impression, timing of dentin sealing application and cavity design optimization on microleakage of ceramic onlays: an in vitro study

Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) is used to improve bonding of indirect restoration. However, interaction between polyether impressions may affect the future bonding of indirect restoration. So, digital impressions with IDS may have a better impact on microleakage. The current in vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of using digital impression versus polyether impression and different dentin sealing techniques on the microleakage of lithium disilicate onlays. A total of 60 identically sized human mandibular molars were allocated into two groups (n = 30): group DI, which uses a digital impression, and group CI, which uses a polyether impression. After preparation of all teeth for onlay, based on the dentin sealing technique, these groups were further divided into three subgroups (n = 10): subgroups I, II, and III. Dentin sealing was postponed in subgroup I prior to cementation. Immediate dentin sealing was applied prior to impression processes in subgroups II and III, plus cavity design optimization (CDO) for subgroup III. All teeth received e.max CAD onlay restoration (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The specimens were exposed to thermocycling with bath temperatures of 5 °C and 55 °C for a total of 5000 cycles. The specimens were then submerged in 0.5% aqueous Rhodamine B dye for 48 h. Buccolingual sections were examined under confocal microscopy. Microleakage was scored (0–3). Data were analyzed using the Scheirer–Ray–Hare test (α = 0.05). Microleakage was significantly lower in DI than CI (P=.0046). Delayed dentin sealing (subgroup I) showed significantly higher microleakage than IDS (subgroup II) and IDS + CDO (subgroup III) (P<.001), with no significant difference between IDS and IDS + CDO. Digital impressions were associated with significantly lower microleakage compared to polyether impressions. IDS, with or without CDO, significantly reduced microleakage compared to delayed sealing. Combining digital impressions with IDS may enhance the marginal seal and longevity of ceramic onlays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08348-w
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of optical impression, timing of dentin sealing application and cavity design optimization on microleakage of ceramic onlays: an in vitro study

Hanan A. Soliman, Ahmed Ismail Taha
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Effect of optical impression, timing of dentin sealing application and cavity design optimization on microleakage of ceramic onlays: an in vitro study

Hanan A. Soliman, Ahmed Ismail Taha
article en

Abstract

Immediate dentin sealing (IDS) is used to improve bonding of indirect restoration. However, interaction between polyether impressions may affect the future bonding of indirect restoration. So, digital impressions with IDS may have a better impact on microleakage. The current in vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of using digital impression versus polyether impression and different dentin sealing techniques on the microleakage of lithium disilicate onlays. A total of 60 identically sized human mandibular molars were allocated into two groups (n = 30): group DI, which uses a digital impression, and group CI, which uses a polyether impression. After preparation of all teeth for onlay, based on the dentin sealing technique, these groups were further divided into three subgroups (n = 10): subgroups I, II, and III. Dentin sealing was postponed in subgroup I prior to cementation. Immediate dentin sealing was applied prior to impression processes in subgroups II and III, plus cavity design optimization (CDO) for subgroup III. All teeth received e.max CAD onlay restoration (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The specimens were exposed to thermocycling with bath temperatures of 5 °C and 55 °C for a total of 5000 cycles. The specimens were then submerged in 0.5% aqueous Rhodamine B dye for 48 h. Buccolingual sections were examined under confocal microscopy. Microleakage was scored (0–3). Data were analyzed using the Scheirer–Ray–Hare test (α = 0.05). Microleakage was significantly lower in DI than CI (P=.0046). Delayed dentin sealing (subgroup I) showed significantly higher microleakage than IDS (subgroup II) and IDS + CDO (subgroup III) (P<.001), with no significant difference between IDS and IDS + CDO. Digital impressions were associated with significantly lower microleakage compared to polyether impressions. IDS, with or without CDO, significantly reduced microleakage compared to delayed sealing. Combining digital impressions with IDS may enhance the marginal seal and longevity of ceramic onlays.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
Science and Technology Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.