Specificity vs. lexical restriction
In this study, we follow up on the theoretical debate on the alleged syntactic effects of D-linking. We tried to tease apart the discourse-related component from the morphosyntactic effects driven by complex wh- phrases by (i) operationalizing D-linking as specificity and (ii) by comparing the acceptability of extraction of wh-items with and without D-linking, but crucially always bearing some form of lexical restriction. We present here three novel acceptability judgment tasks inspecting the role of D-linking and lexical restriction in the amelioration of Italian wh-island effects. Our results weaken the hypothesis that a discourse factor alone may modulate wh-island violations, while demanding deeper scrutiny on the role of lexical restriction.
Authors
- Cristiano Chesi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-1348)
- Adriana Belletti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1117-0721)
- Veronica Bressan
Institutions
- University of Siena (IT)
- Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
- Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BieJournals
- Published
- 2026-04-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.11576/glow-1237
- Primary Topic
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00