Teaching early-career researchers how to respond to peer reviewers
The process of publishing a research article in a scientific journal inevitably involves revising the original version of the article to respond to the concerns raised by peer reviewers. In this article we describe a course module that introduces MSc students at Utrecht University in the Netherlands to this part of the publication process. During the module the students and an invited speaker actively discuss the revision process for a recent article by the speaker. Feedback from students and speakers on the module - which could be readily transferred to other courses in the life and biomedical sciences - has been largely positive.
Authors
- Manon Kluijtmans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-7639)
- Eric Kalkhoven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-7286)
Institutions
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- eLife
- Published
- 2026-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.102619
- Primary Topic
- Academic Writing and Publishing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Francis Crick Institute
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne