Seagrass Sampling Methods in a Community‐Based Setting, A Comparative Analysis

ABSTRACT Effective monitoring of seagrass is essential for the conservation of this critical marine ecosystem. The choice of monitoring method depends on balancing accuracy, efficiency, cost and accessibility, especially in contexts requiring community engagement and ownership. This study evaluates and compares three seagrass monitoring methods, including video, quadrat and point count, at a field site in Kenya to assess their suitability for community‐led monitoring in resource‐limited settings. The video method, used as a benchmark, demonstrated high precision with moderate resource demands, requiring 18 samples to detect a 20% change in cover with 80% statistical power. However, its technical complexity and initial setup costs could limit community adoption. Quadrat sampling, while labour‐intensive, provided reliable estimates of species richness and total cover, although it required a larger sample size (36) than the video method to achieve the same power. Point count, the least resource‐intensive method, was time‐efficient but consistently overestimated seagrass cover. These results support the widely used SeagrassNet and Seagrass‐Watch sampling methods. These accessible methods can both supply accurate data and help to foster local ownership and capacity. The findings highlight trade‐offs between the methods, suggesting that combining technical training with simplified tools such as automated analyses and accessible data interpretation frameworks could enhance the applicability of advanced techniques like the video method in community settings. While accessible technological advancements might improve accuracy and efficiency, such benefits need to be balanced against the wider community engagement in monitoring and conservation. Nevertheless, quadrat sampling emerges as the most suitable method for immediate community use, given its reliability and accessibility, while the integration of video methods could be pursued where resources and training permit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70382
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seagrass Sampling Methods in a Community‐Based Setting, A Comparative Analysis

Michael N. Githaiga, Mark Huxham, Robert A. Briers, Claudia Foster et al.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Seagrass Sampling Methods in a Community‐Based Setting, A Comparative Analysis

Michael N. Githaiga, Mark Huxham, Robert A. Briers, Claudia Foster, Edward M. Mwikamba
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Effective monitoring of seagrass is essential for the conservation of this critical marine ecosystem. The choice of monitoring method depends on balancing accuracy, efficiency, cost and accessibility, especially in contexts requiring community engagement and ownership. This study evaluates and compares three seagrass monitoring methods, including video, quadrat and point count, at a field site in Kenya to assess their suitability for community‐led monitoring in resource‐limited settings. The video method, used as a benchmark, demonstrated high precision with moderate resource demands, requiring 18 samples to detect a 20% change in cover with 80% statistical power. However, its technical complexity and initial setup costs could limit community adoption. Quadrat sampling, while labour‐intensive, provided reliable estimates of species richness and total cover, although it required a larger sample size (36) than the video method to achieve the same power. Point count, the least resource‐intensive method, was time‐efficient but consistently overestimated seagrass cover. These results support the widely used SeagrassNet and Seagrass‐Watch sampling methods. These accessible methods can both supply accurate data and help to foster local ownership and capacity. The findings highlight trade‐offs between the methods, suggesting that combining technical training with simplified tools such as automated analyses and accessible data interpretation frameworks could enhance the applicability of advanced techniques like the video method in community settings. While accessible technological advancements might improve accuracy and efficiency, such benefits need to be balanced against the wider community engagement in monitoring and conservation. Nevertheless, quadrat sampling emerges as the most suitable method for immediate community use, given its reliability and accessibility, while the integration of video methods could be pursued where resources and training permit.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(5)
Edinburgh Napier University (GB), University of Embu (KE), Seafish (GB)
Edinburgh Napier University, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.