Effectiveness of PEWI for student learning about agriculture and ecosystem service trade‐offs

Abstract Training students to effectively evaluate complex information is crucial for achieving multidimensional goals in agricultural and natural resource management. The People in Ecosystems Watershed Integration (PEWI) digital learning tool was developed to facilitate student exploration and learning toward this end. Previous research documented PEWI's alignment with the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Standards and Next Generation Science Standards. However, its effect on learning outcomes, such as intrinsic motivation, critical thinking, comprehension, and knowledge self‐efficacy, had not yet been assessed. We addressed this gap by examining PEWI's impact on the learning of 58 volunteer students enrolled in an undergraduate natural resource economics class at Iowa State University. Learning outcomes were assessed through a post‐training evaluation survey instrument. Students' evaluation of PEWI was positive across all measures: K‐mode statistical classification only produced clusters of students with “agree” or “strongly agree” responses and no neutral or negative clusters. Structural equation modeling indicated that PEWI's impact on critical thinking and comprehension contributed to a high sense of knowledge self‐efficacy for designing watersheds to meet multiple agricultural and ecosystem service outcomes. Overall, this case study supports PEWI's ability to help students holistically assess complex information and implement changes in management practices and land use that minimize agroecosystem tradeoffs and maximize synergies in a virtual space. The next step is to assess whether students can apply their learning to the real world, leading to positive outcomes for people, soil, water, and wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural sciences education
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.70053
Primary Topic
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of PEWI for student learning about agriculture and ecosystem service trade‐offs

Richard Magala, Lisa A. Schulte, John C Tyndall
Natural sciences education
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
article

Effectiveness of PEWI for student learning about agriculture and ecosystem service trade‐offs

Richard Magala, Lisa A. Schulte, John C Tyndall
article en

Abstract

Abstract Training students to effectively evaluate complex information is crucial for achieving multidimensional goals in agricultural and natural resource management. The People in Ecosystems Watershed Integration (PEWI) digital learning tool was developed to facilitate student exploration and learning toward this end. Previous research documented PEWI's alignment with the Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources Standards and Next Generation Science Standards. However, its effect on learning outcomes, such as intrinsic motivation, critical thinking, comprehension, and knowledge self‐efficacy, had not yet been assessed. We addressed this gap by examining PEWI's impact on the learning of 58 volunteer students enrolled in an undergraduate natural resource economics class at Iowa State University. Learning outcomes were assessed through a post‐training evaluation survey instrument. Students' evaluation of PEWI was positive across all measures: K‐mode statistical classification only produced clusters of students with “agree” or “strongly agree” responses and no neutral or negative clusters. Structural equation modeling indicated that PEWI's impact on critical thinking and comprehension contributed to a high sense of knowledge self‐efficacy for designing watersheds to meet multiple agricultural and ecosystem service outcomes. Overall, this case study supports PEWI's ability to help students holistically assess complex information and implement changes in management practices and land use that minimize agroecosystem tradeoffs and maximize synergies in a virtual space. The next step is to assess whether students can apply their learning to the real world, leading to positive outcomes for people, soil, water, and wildlife.

Natural sciences educationVol. 55(1)
Iowa State University (US)
McKnight Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effectiveness of PEWI for student learning about agriculture and ecosystem service trade‐offs — Richard Magala, Lisa A. Schulte, et al. · Natural sciences education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS